gubellini 2,883 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 Back to the topic! What date will be set for a hearing on this case? My guess is April 1st! 7 elbow, biff, napier and 4 others reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leggy 2,752 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 I have expertise in determining and working with serious emotional distress admin. Some of Midget's posts have definitely caused me that. In fact I have also suffered physical injury as well as the emotional injury. That was a sprained thumb from when I fell off my chair as a result of uncontrollable laughter. 4 biff, TOM(the other Molloy), Canelo and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gubellini 2,883 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 Leggy that will be my fate as well when the result of this tawdry case is announced. 1 sharrymac reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
von Smallhaussen 3,167 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 anyone know how the Hamilton County Bluegrass Band got their name? 4 biff, Leggy, bloke and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leggy 2,752 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 10 minutes ago, von Smallhaussen said: anyone know how the Hamilton County Bluegrass Band got their name? Didn't they start off as the Muleskinners? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
von Smallhaussen 3,167 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 12 hours ago, Midget said: a couple of sets of tennis, about to serve 5 GONSTA, elbow, Leggy and 2 others reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Midget 4,372 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 I don't troll you Hesi, but I certainly react when you troll me. My lacerating responses to various posters do not constitute trolling, just intolerance when posters demonstrate stupidity or peddle incorrect or misleading information. There is no poster that I troll or continually react to other than those who antagonistically troll me first. You fall into that category unfortunately. You should be banned for trolling and I have considerable faith that admin will look at your history and take a proactive position with regard to your behaviour. With regard to your degree, I should have ignored that but my position is that it's not polite to boast about what you've done or not done in racing or with regard to your education, and when you do you'll be humoured for what might be considered to be acting like a wxxxker. Stop trolling please, find someone else to be fixated with. Thsnks Midget 1 Memphis2 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
von Smallhaussen 3,167 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 25 minutes ago, Leggy said: Didn't they start off as the Muleskinners? correct! 1 elbow reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gubellini 2,883 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 Memo Mike Godber When you appear on your weekly comedy spot on Peter Earley's Trackside Radio programme tomorrow and are questioned about the Wexford case please PRESENT a straight face. 1 napier reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leggy 2,752 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, hesi said: I'll leave others to judge this post and resist the temptation to comment myself lol....you just did! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gazza123 51 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 if the defence is correct and high readings are from water troughs,is this a admission that all winners from this stable will have had high cobalt readings and were presented to race under the influence technically,opens a can of worms 3 sharrymac, Los Lobos and integrity reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
von Smallhaussen 3,167 Report post Posted March 1, 2016 55 minutes ago, gazza123 said: if the defence is correct and high readings are from water troughs,is this a admission that all winners from this stable will have had high cobalt readings and were presented to race under the influence technically,opens a can of worms what about those that placed and were never swabbed? 1 sharrymac reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scooby3051 4,576 Report post Posted March 1, 2016 Guys I am over all this sniping and back biting and he said she said shyte... anymore personal attacks and I WILL step in and ban whoever does it, I hope I am clear on this as I have said many times healthy debate is totally fine but a few of you in here seem to need to stoop to personal attacks on each other so keep it up and see where it lands you. This is not a site that will tolerate that. Leigh 4 Grant R, ADM, Canelo and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yorkielad 108 Report post Posted March 1, 2016 Anyone know who got swabbed last Saturday ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rdytdy 4,791 Report post Posted March 1, 2016 20 minutes ago, Yorkielad said: Anyone know who got swabbed last Saturday ? Matamata: Swabbing: AOTEAROWER, MARY QUANT, LAUBERHORN, HEROIC VALOUR, MONGOLIAN FALCON, TRIACTION, GOLD RUSH, SASSY ‘N’ SMART, PERFECT FIT, GUARANTOR, THEE OLD FLOOZIE, CHENILLE Otaki: Swabbing: ROCK MY SOUL; MORSE CODE; INCANTATION; PIECE OF KATE; BORDEAUX; IRISH WHISPER; VOLKSTOK’N’BARRELL; JULINSKY PRINCE SCAPOLO; POSTER GIRL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 2Admin2 Report post Posted March 2, 2016 Welcome regman - interesting first post. May I ask what motivated you to post in racecafe? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GONSTA 1,148 Report post Posted March 2, 2016 5 minutes ago, 2Admin2 said: Welcome regman - interesting first post. May I ask what motivated you to post in racecafe? Why did his post get deleted ?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scooby3051 4,576 Report post Posted March 2, 2016 He is entitled to his opinion just as I am entitled to think it was not warranted here, I am happy for honest debate but disrespecting people until the case has been proven i don't agree with...just my opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GONSTA 1,148 Report post Posted March 2, 2016 3 minutes ago, scooby3051 said: He is entitled to his opinion just as I am entitled to think it was not warranted here, I am happy for honest debate but disrespecting people until the case has been proven i don't agree with...just my opinion. There was absolutely nothing wrong with his post. Great to see certain opinions aren't tolerated on here even when they havn't broken any rules. The case doesn't need to be proven Scooby, regardless of what happens they still had an unfair advantage and their horses were running far from au natural. The defence is hardly believable don't you agree? 3 chevy86, napier and Los Lobos reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scooby3051 4,576 Report post Posted March 2, 2016 My house my rules and i thought the post was not appropriate...end of story. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TOM(the other Molloy) 1,773 Report post Posted March 2, 2016 On 3/1/2016 at 3:09 PM, Yorkielad said: Anyone know who got swabbed last Saturday ? Yorkielad you ought to know that every winner gets swabbed these days and the first three placegetters in listed and group races(thought to be fair I see only the first two at Matamata - maybe they do not have swabbing facilities for three or only two vets available That occurs every meeting every week. No need to wonder whether the O'Sullivan Scott horse got swabbed after the Breeders - you can guarantee it did without even looking at the stewards report. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Goat 19 Report post Posted March 5, 2016 On 2/29/2016 at 9:56 PM, Midget said: Your use of words is a touch ambiguous, not sure if you've done that on purpose but I'll answer by saying "no, I wouldn't take cobalt in any form other than VB12 as I don't need to radiate and glow at night ". You ? If you meant would I accept the readings claimed then I'll just say that I would acknowledge that based on all available evidence it's "possible" the levels indicated did in fact occur by water contamination. Like you though I'd like to know more and I eagerly await the hearing. It's not possible! To test 600 it would have to be injected everyone knows that. Feel free to show anything that says otherwise. PS Lance was my idol growing up, i believe any trainer using Cobalt should be banned for life, very dangerous at those levels. 2 Los Lobos and awego reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ashoka 1,179 Report post Posted March 5, 2016 Midget... You say that "...that based on all available evidence it's "possible" the levels indicated did in fact occur by water contamination." I don't believe that this is correct. It has been established, I believe, that the said "limit" can be exceeded by water contamination but nowhere has it been established that the levels recorded could be, This is a salient point that, I believe, will become of major significance as this matter plays out. All the best. Ashoka 1 Los Lobos reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 2Admin2 Report post Posted March 5, 2016 2 hours ago, Goat said: It's not possible! To test 600 it would have to be injected everyone knows that. Feel free to show anything that says otherwise. PS Lance was my idol growing up, i believe any trainer using Cobalt should be banned for life, very dangerous at those levels. Can you provide the science that supports your contention that "it's not possible to test 600 without injection"? There is evidence to the contrary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leggy 2,752 Report post Posted March 5, 2016 49 minutes ago, 2Admin2 said: There is evidence to the contrary. Nothing published that I've seen. Not even close. I don't preclude the possibility but please point us to it. 1 Insider reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
