Jump to content
BIG KAHUNA CHARITY PUNTERS CLUB CONTINUES THIS SATURDAY

Recommended Posts

Posted

Question 1: How would you react and what action would you take if a stallion leased out for racing was gelded by the leasse without the owners consent.?

Question 2:.Would the RIU have any liability if they approved the action only to realize later that their advice was incorrect.?

Posted
42 minutes ago, IWMC said:

Question 1: How would you react and what action would you take if a stallion leased out for racing was gelded by the leasse without the owners consent.?

Question 2:.Would the RIU have any liability if they approved the action only to realize later that their advice was incorrect.?

Contract law civil matter 

not sure how you implicate RIU as a party to a private lease agreement???

Posted

I would have thought that any material action that is likely to influence the breeding prospects of the leased animal would surely have to be agreed with the owner..... and I think we can agree that cutting its n**s off is a material action!!

Posted
13 hours ago, Dopey said:

Contract law civil matter 

not sure how you implicate RIU as a party to a private lease agreement???

You are correct. It is a civil matter. If the owner is unable to negotiate a settlemnt

then it goes to court.Over the years I have been involved in a few like this and  also a situation where a mare under lease has been served by a stallion without the approval of  the owner

This has nothing to do with the RIU. They need to mind their own business.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, chevy86 said:

Precedent set? when that Bobbit guy was gelded by his missus? My mistake, think he was dis-membered.

Someone told me he had 6 months physiotherapy after they sewed it back on. Always an upside i guess.

Posted
On 1 June 2017 at 7:55 PM, scooby3051 said:

Is there a clause in the lease agreement that he can not be gelded???

Yes as follows. 

 

9    NO colt, entire or rig shall be gelded without the lessors written consent.

 

Posted
On 1 June 2017 at 8:33 PM, Dopey said:

Contract law civil matter 

not sure how you implicate RIU as a party to a private lease agreement???

They administer the rules of racing overall. After that it is legal matter sorted in the Courts.

Posted
On 1 June 2017 at 9:29 PM, Gruff said:

Seems a no brainer from both parties perspectives....this actually happen:blink:

Sure did. Case will be referred to RIU for action

Posted

 

1 hour ago, IWMC said:

They administer the rules of racing overall. After that it is legal matter sorted in the Courts.

I can see how you think riu control a third party in terms of gelding??? A tough outcome sure but not sure you can blame a governing body for a third party action. Good luck 

Posted
5 hours ago, rumpole said:

Indeed but it is a matter of breach of contract and nothing to do with the RIU

or NZTR

And for the avoidance of doubt that is very clearly stated in NZTR's own registration of lease form:

NZTR cannot determine nor control facets of a private lease agreement such as right of purchase, right of renewal, special conditions, etc. The lease form is notification of an agreement and our key points are the start date and finish date of the lease and the details of the Racing Manager, and all lessees involved. It is therefore recommended that the parties to the lease have their own agreement in place to cover all aspects associated with the lease and welfare of the horse.

Posted
6 hours ago, john legend said:

If the leassees have a right of purchase I think a strong solicitors letter giving them 7 days to exercise their rop. should be enough to get action. otherwise stick with the squaregaitors IWMCNIC. WE ARE ALL HONEST  lol.

There is a rumour that  some idiot from the RIU told the lessor it was OK to go ahead and geld the horse  I can see a nice juicy court case against the lessor and the RIU coming up  Go justice

Posted
On 6/15/2017 at 5:58 PM, Leggy said:

OMG...are you serious Rumpers? There's only one I can think of that would be that stupid..... but surely not?

The one who asked, the one who answered and I'd grill the vet too. Assuming that the horse wasn't winning much, the vet might have some money.

Similar to a tenant demolishing part of a house, I see this as a clear-cut case.

Posted
On 17/06/2017 at 10:18 AM, Phar Lap Fan said:

The one who asked, the one who answered and I'd grill the vet too. Assuming that the horse wasn't winning much, the vet might have some money.

Similar to a tenant demolishing part of a house, I see this as a clear-cut case.

If it is true the fact that the RIU gave crook advice is an absolute disgrace

Posted
On ‎15‎/‎06‎/‎2017 at 10:28 AM, rumpole said:

There is a rumour that  some idiot from the RIU told the lessor it was OK to go ahead and geld the horse  I can see a nice juicy court case against the lessor and the RIU coming up  Go justice

I can relate to that, I leased a horse to a group and they owed quite a bit of money to the trainer. One of the group phoned NZ Racing and was told the owner of the horse (me) was responsible for the debt, not the lessee's.

Posted
18 hours ago, trakdap said:

I can relate to that, I leased a horse to a group and they owed quite a bit of money to the trainer. One of the group phoned NZ Racing and was told the owner of the horse (me) was responsible for the debt, not the lessee's.

Who did they talk to at NZ Racing? The tea lady or the cleaner?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

While the owners and managers of RaceCafe endeavour to moderate and control the site and posts on it, they give no guarantee that posts are true and correct, and take no responsibility whatsoever for what individuals post on the site.

Posts do not necessarily reflect the sentiments, views or beliefs of Race Cafe or its owners and management.

The owners and managers of RaceCafe reserve the right to remove posts from the site and to provide details of members whose posts warrant scrutiny.