Jump to content
BIG KAHUNA CHARITY PUNTERS CLUB CONTINUES THIS SATURDAY

Recommended Posts

Posted

No one seems to have noticed the HB New Years meeting in trouble. 58 noms for the entire programme. They have left open races with 3 and 4 noms. In the SI they would instantly delete those races because of insufficient interest. Seems to be different rules for the NI. That meeting has always struggled for horses and yet nothing has ever been done about it. Waikouaiti got moved off NY's day, perhaps HB should be next to go.

Posted

NZTR is saying that if they don’t get more nominations the meeting won’t go ahead. 


How many more do they need for it to proceed?
 

It reminds me of the Health Inspector arriving at Bart Cummings training establishment, then proceeding to tell Bart that he had too many flies at which Bart asked; “how many am I allowed?”

With regard to HB I guess we wait until tomorrow. 

Posted

Only about 50 horses nominated. 7 or 8 are in two races, one in 3 races. Even the 3 and 4 horse fields have one horse nominated in both. It's a pity more can't be done to attract horses to meetings that get a large public turnout. 

Posted
2 hours ago, We're Doomed said:

No one seems to have noticed the HB New Years meeting in trouble. 58 noms for the entire programme. They have left open races with 3 and 4 noms. In the SI they would instantly delete those races because of insufficient interest. Seems to be different rules for the NI. That meeting has always struggled for horses and yet nothing has ever been done about it. Waikouaiti got moved off NY's day, perhaps HB should be next to go.

Thinking the same,wait till ,Wairarapa maybe each is cancelling the other one out.

Posted

What's the nature of the problem? Is there too much racing for the horse population at this time of year?

The ground is a Dead 5 so shouldn't be an issue.

Is it a quality vs quantity question? Given there are many more slow horses than fast ones, races for slow horses should attract more entries.

The problem is punters don't just want wide-open low-grade handicaps. There has to be some variety and if that means a 3-runner race, doesn't mean it can't be interesting.

Is the problem one of race planning - too many of the same kind of race in the same region - I see NZ runs three meetings only rarely and perhaps it can only really sustain two on any day?

Posted
8 hours ago, uneasy said:

You’re right I understand open 1200 at Riverton deleted with 5 noms (3 dual noms) but should have been at least given a chance!!

Riverton may still get the 9 races judging by noms for some races.

Posted
8 hours ago, uneasy said:

You’re right I understand open 1200 at Riverton deleted with 5 noms (3 dual noms) but should have been at least given a chance!!

And Kurow had a race deleted as well. A couple of weeks ago a race with 6 initial noms was warned it would need more noms to go ahead. I think it is totally safe to say that any race in the SI with 3 or 4 noms would be deleted instantly.

Posted
14 hours ago, mikenz said:

Just to add,this is a situation where maybe dual code meetings would be a option.

Just to add,Tauranga and Thames following Rotorua,maybe a bit of overkill

Exactlley with Taupo as well

 

Posted
1 hour ago, gubellini said:

Tauranga Saturday 4 nominated for the Open 1400m; 5 nominated for the R74 2100m; 5 nominated for the R65 1400m; 7 nominated for the R74 1200m. Disastrous numbers for tote turnovers.

Best thing is to reduce meetings,ok after Tauranga is Thames ,any idea how they are shaping?

Posted
33 minutes ago, gubellini said:

mikenz Thames race at Te Aroha on Sunday. 198 nominations for the 8 races. Unless they split some of the Maiden races some horses will miss a start.

So just looking at Tauranga and Hastings dump those meetings,shift Wairarapa to Jan 1,shift Taranaki back to one day,leave Thames as they are,simple.and by getting riddof Tauranga it will probably increase numbers for Taupo,a popular holiday spot,Tauranga and Hastings run a lot of good meetings,reducing them by one won't hurt them at all,they have other days to shine in the sun

 

Posted
14 hours ago, mikenz said:

So just looking at Tauranga and Hastings dump those meetings,shift Wairarapa to Jan 1,shift Taranaki back to one day,leave Thames as they are,simple.and by getting riddof Tauranga it will probably increase numbers for Taupo,a popular holiday spot,Tauranga and Hastings run a lot of good meetings,reducing them by one won't hurt them at all,they have other days to shine in the sun

 

A lot of what you say will happen generically the way the industry is being operated, at any rate.

Posted
19 minutes ago, mikenz said:

6races at Wairarapa and,that's  6at Hastings as well,might makes sense to just have one good one,what do others reckon?

Incedently 5 trotting races as well,so this is another option,cd area needs more harness racing Taranaki the other day could have also,run some harness,would be interesting though to see how numbers stacked up,Cambridge raced yesty but the litmus test would be would the harness guys go on the road trip,contrary to what the suits think I actually think some like the odd road trip,it's a bit of variety.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

While the owners and managers of RaceCafe endeavour to moderate and control the site and posts on it, they give no guarantee that posts are true and correct, and take no responsibility whatsoever for what individuals post on the site.

Posts do not necessarily reflect the sentiments, views or beliefs of Race Cafe or its owners and management.

The owners and managers of RaceCafe reserve the right to remove posts from the site and to provide details of members whose posts warrant scrutiny.