Wolverine

[nomates]

1 minute ago, scooby3051 said:

Then you know what to do...right.......that will be your last reply unless NM wants you to answer anything...you add nothing to an otherwise happy and vibrant site with good factual discussions...

I'm quite happy if he posts facts that show me bashing TA , I know I haven't .

If I have an issue with my horses I have let the relevant people at TA know , but I have never posted those opinions on here , I have also passed on bouquets when I think it was earned .

[scooby3051]

2 minutes ago, Canterbury Man said:

WTF are you on about?  You take Leggies money and then ban him!!!  Dare you to publish this post.

Now you have another rule where unless one of your sycophants who breaks ALL your rules replies you won't publish someone else's post.

Weird.

Once again Douggie boy you are wrong...Leggy donated to a charity,,,nothing to do with me...he was dishonest ..alot like you...and got caught out...so I dont like people like that here and you just hide under so many names, but one by one I found them out...god knows how many members you really have very few I would say as you are always here....no you were asked a valid question you chose not to answer after spouting off"you could name a dozen at least" but all BS as always.

[scooby3051]

Leggy/curious/Racingoutsider is not banned, just to be 100% clear...more lies there Douggie.

[nomates]

5 minutes ago, Canterbury Man said:

Really Bob?  Why express an opinion about something you don't have all the facts about?

Because it's a discussion about her possible value . I don't need facts , I know her race record and breeding so have expressed an opinion .

That's all it is nothing more , more nothing less .

Now I understand your probably feeling left out because you've only had 2 posts all day on your thoroughbred site , but really if you could only see what a sad old man you are coming across as .

 

[TurnyTom]

Why is CM back?

Not needed, tell him to FO back to his own site, just not needed here as he offers zip

[scooby3051]

41 minutes ago, TurnyTom said:

Why is CM back?

Not needed, tell him to FO back to his own site, just not needed here as he offers zip

Just allowed him to reply to the lie he posted about NM and I...yes agreed he offers zero...

[JJ Flash]

12 hours ago, scooby3051 said:

She would have some residual value I guess but way less than the 850K forked out for her.

Who knows what she will fetch but as the old saying goes " When the Gavel drops the bullshit stops"

[JJ Flash]

On 4/24/2025 at 6:49 PM, Pure Steel said:

what have you got that actually helps with the perplexing problem?   

I was not the one making all the flamboyant claims Gamma. Good of you to try and bail him out though.

[JJ Flash]

12 hours ago, Canterbury Man said:

What s love fest Bob  nomates and Leigh  Scooby.

Resorting to naming   posters on here- a new low even by your standards

[scooby3051]

15 minutes ago, JJ Flash said:

Resorting to naming   posters on here- a new low even by your standards

He certainly is that...but we already new that anyway.

[Canterbury Man]

23 minutes ago, JJ Flash said:

Resorting to naming   posters on here- a new low even by your standards

Really one rule for some another rule for others?

[Canterbury Man]

11 hours ago, scooby3051 said:

Leggy/curious/Racingoutsider is not banned, just to be 100% clear...more lies there 

Then why does this message pop up - who is lying?  Bet you don't publish this post.

[scooby3051]

20 minutes ago, Canterbury Man said:

Then why does this message pop up - who is lying?  Bet you don't publish this post.

Dont you know the difference, he is restricted from posting not banned...banned is permanent.. as he was trying to pose as someone else..decietful and dishonest...thats why you and he get along so well...maybe now you will be the same too.I pay the bills here and if people like yourself and Leggy want to be dishonest and cause trouble yes you will be thrown out. So many people have asked why you are not gone yet, you add nothing here you wont answer questions after boasting you could, no not worth wasting any more time on....and anyone else who tries to do the same will be given the same treatment.

Leggy was already on thin ice and he knows the reason why...I dont like two faced people sorry...my house my rules like them or leave your choice.

I just want a forum where everyone can get along have their say and not get accused of false baseless accusations.

[JJ Flash]

1 hour ago, Canterbury Man said:

Then why does this message pop up - who is lying?  Bet you don't publish this post.

You know all about restricting users- how stupid are you.

Im sure Curious /Leggy can speak for himself or you now his lacky as well

[nomates]

2 hours ago, JJ Flash said:

Resorting to naming   posters on here- a new low even by your standards

Doesn't worry me , plenty know my name , I have nothing to hide .

[Blue]

And if you really need a positive TA comment, the Avantage filly turned things around and won nicely at Tuesday's trials.

[scooby3051]

3 minutes ago, Blue said:

And if you really need a positive TA comment, the Avantage filly turned things around and won nicely at Tuesday's trials.

Yes it was better than the first trial, but a win in a heat on a bog track...improved but a long way to go ...but you are right heading in the right direction...Nobody has rubbished TA this  is a debate with differing views and poor old CM tries to distort the facts...but sadly he is outnumbered here by knowledgable posters.

[JJ Flash]

1 hour ago, nomates said:

I have nothing to hide .

We know that NM unlike some that come here under different names to derail threads

[Blue]

6 hours ago, scooby3051 said:

Yes it was better than the first trial, but a win in a heat on a bog track...improved but a long way to go ...but you are right heading in the right direction...Nobody has rubbished TA this  is a debate with differing views and poor old CM tries to distort the facts...but sadly he is outnumbered here by knowledgable posters.

If she can only go in a bog it certainly limits her opportunities of emulating her Dam but this effort must certainly give connections a measure of optimism.

[Nerula]

6 hours ago, scooby3051 said:

Yes it was better than the first trial, but a win in a heat on a bog track...improved but a long way to go ...but you are right heading in the right direction...Nobody has rubbished TA this  is a debate with differing views and poor old CM tries to distort the facts...but sadly he is outnumbered here by knowledgable posters.

Drew 1 in Trial 1 on a bog track what goos luck  (18 heats).. Michael McNab doing the biz for TA now. The horse that was second could have taken that if they wanted.

[scooby3051]

Just now, Nerula said:

Drew 1 in Trial 1 on a bog track what goos luck  (18 heats).. Michael McNab doing the biz for TA now. The horse that was second could have taken that if they wanted.

It needs to be winning Group races at a minimum...lets hope she keeps going forward but a long way to go yet.

There were some other nice trials there too....

[sunlineboy]

22 minutes ago, Nerula said:

Drew 1 in Trial 1 on a bog track what goos luck  (18 heats).. Michael McNab doing the biz for TA now. The horse that was second could have taken that if they wanted.

The second horse was pushed early in the straight. The Te Akau runner wasn't touched, so it's fair to say the TA runner could have cleared out by 3-4 lengths if they wanted.

[scooby3051]

16 minutes ago, sunlineboy said:

The second horse was pushed early in the straight. The Te Akau runner wasn't touched, so it's fair to say the TA runner could have cleared out by 3-4 lengths if they wanted.

In your opinion is she a group winner in waiting???

[sunlineboy]

1 hour ago, scooby3051 said:

In your opinion is she a group winner in waiting???

Unlikely, which is the case for 99% of horses.

[scooby3051]

1 hour ago, sunlineboy said:

Unlikely, which is the case for 99% of horses.

yes agree but 99% of horses dont cost 2 million bucks....