poundforpound

Remarkable similarities between

Recommended Posts

What’s happened with the Wanaka absconded, how they used their “essential worker” status, where they went, who owned the house they stayed in, suppression of offenders names and family names and occupations….and the judicial web of intrigue involved … very similar to the RIU / JCA axis of abuse and orchestration of the judiciary 

Not a great look and certainly doesn’t stand scrutiny .. or pass the “whiff” test 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The mother of this idiot is apparently a high up in the legal profession ….hence the late night conference to push the name suppression.

Yesterday afternoon, Reed asked the District Court to suppress the identities of her clients from publication and the identity of the man's parent, who is a high-ranking public official, before their first court appearance.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, chevy86 said:

After suppression now playing the "mental health" card via a friend. Their arrogance now belittling genuine sufferers.

If they are genuinely remorseful they would front up, fess up and cop the consequences. JMO.

And all this without even being charged. One would hope once charged they'll plead guilty and accept the consequences of their actions. That's about as likely as Trump being 'reinstated' anytime soon. If the police back off and don't lay charges, they'll be people rioting in the streets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Ohokaman said:

The mother of this idiot is apparently a high up in the legal profession ….hence the late night conference to push the name suppression.

Yesterday afternoon, Reed asked the District Court to suppress the identities of her clients from publication and the identity of the man's parent, who is a high-ranking public official, before their first court appearance.

 

That name suppression runs out at 7pm tonight. However no doubt they applied for, and received, extended name suppression today. 

Virtually all internet presence off the couple vanished at various times last night. Moderators on Reddit deleting all names and direct references, business websites deleted and/or made "private", but it's impossible to delete everything as so many people live such public lives in the internet these days. Despite gaining the interim name suppression in the evening yesterday, many people knew who they were earlier in the afternoon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Idolmite said:

That name suppression runs out at 7pm tonight. However no doubt they applied for, and received, extended name suppression today. 

Virtually all internet presence off the couple vanished at various times last night. Moderators on Reddit deleting all names and direct references, business websites deleted and/or made "private", but it's impossible to delete everything as so many people live such public lives in the internet these days. Despite gaining the interim name suppression in the evening yesterday, many people knew who they were earlier in the afternoon. 

Apology tonight and no extension for name suppression. Manning up or just accepting the fact the names are already out there… ?.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the two monkeys that did what they did, they didn't break the law, they just broke the ethics rules..

Worry about a judge making a confession - when she didn't have to be involved -  that she didn't know what was happening.. 

This lady sits on a bench in judgement of others.. 

She has more history than most of the people she has sentenced.. 

This needs to be looked at.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So when will the others who have done the same be charged.  Good enough for these 2 good enough for all the rest who ran off to their batches both Level 4's, to date one of them have been charged.  Just like the Rottenrua man who's been the 1st to be charged for not wearing a mask, see it all the time, they haven't charged them.  What's good for 1 is good for all.  Although I know popo would have targeted him again.  It was pick on PK again. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a slight tangent to the topic being raised...

but what it does highlight, is how a Judge with their authority, can Trump police enforcement abuses... should they have the courage to do so!!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Ragamuffin said:

So when will the others who have done the same be charged.  Good enough for these 2 good enough for all the rest who ran off to their batches both Level 4's, to date one of them have been charged.  Just like the Rottenrua man who's been the 1st to be charged for not wearing a mask, see it all the time, they haven't charged them.  What's good for 1 is good for all.  Although I know popo would have targeted him again.  It was pick on PK again. 

Most of those Aucklanders that run off to the bach do so between the lockdown announcement and the lockdown actually starting. Immoral perhaps, but not illegal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with this case is that they stayed in a house at Wanaka owned by Tony & Judge Jo Boshier…Tony is a lawyer and ex cop, Jo is a retired judge

The joint owners of the house are Robert Willis ( William Willis’s father ) and Matawhio, as in Matawhio Sports horses, a Karaka based company owned by…..Judge Mary-Beth Sharp, Williams mother 

The QC acting for them is the high profile Rached Reid, said to be the daughter of Michael Read QC ( I haven’t had that verified )

So we have an entitled couple, with very close connections to more than one judge, a retired cop, and one of the judges has “considerable history”

The critical questions that should be asked though are 

1. How did William Willis get an essential worker document, he’s an equestrian with a hay cutting business on the side  ( Hannah Walmsley can because all criminal barristers get them automatically ) but someone fiddled the system to get William a pass….who did that, who signed that, and what’s on that document ?

2. who actually let them through the border and why ?, they can’t have had an urgent case south of the Bombay Hills

3. Who is the lady who was staying at the same house in Wanaka, she’s described as tallish, 5’11”, elegant, early sixties, with dark short hair

4. why didn’t they ‘fess up straight away ?

5. which District Court judge gave then interim suppression and what’s that judges relationship with Mary-Beth Sharp, if any 

I can’t help thinking there’s a lot left in this story yet 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, poundforpound said:

The problem with this case is that they stayed in a house at Wanaka owned by Tony & Judge Jo Boshier…Tony is a lawyer and ex cop, Jo is a retired judge

The joint owners of the house are Robert Willis ( William Willis’s father ) and Matawhio, as in Matawhio Sports horses, a Karaka based company owned by…..Judge Mary-Beth Sharp, Williams mother 

The QC acting for them is the high profile Rached Reid, daughter of Michael Read

So we have an entitled couple, with very close connections to more than one judge, a retired cop, and one of the judges has “considerable history”

The critical questions that should be asked though are 

1. How did William Willis get an essential worker document, he’s an equestrian with a hay cutting business on the side  ( Hannah Walmsley can because all criminal barristers get them automatically ) but someone fiddled the system to get William a pass….who did that, who signed that, and what’s on that document ?

2. who actually let them through the border and why ?, they can’t have had an urgent case south of the Bombay Hills

3. Who is the lady who was staying at the same house in Wanaka, she’s described as tallish, 5’11”, elegant, early sixties, with dark short hair

4. why didn’t they ‘fess up straight away ?

5. which District Court judge gave then interim suppression and what’s that judges relationship with Mary-Beth Sharp, if any 

I can’t help thinking there’s a lot left in this story yet 

 

How likely is it that there will be an impartial judge at their hearing, when the judiciary is similar to a 'closed shop' work-place and they seem to be beyond reproach? Read somewhere recently about the Judicial Conduct Commissioner but, as I recall, he/she is not very busy - like nobody has ever been censured?

As usual, remorse is only needed when you are caught.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, poundforpound said:

The problem with this case is that they stayed in a house at Wanaka owned by Tony & Judge Jo Boshier…Tony is a lawyer and ex cop, Jo is a retired judge

The joint owners of the house are Robert Willis ( William Willis’s father ) and Matawhio, as in Matawhio Sports horses, a Karaka based company owned by…..Judge Mary-Beth Sharp, Williams mother 

The QC acting for them is the high profile Rached Reid, said to be the daughter of Michael Read QC ( I haven’t had that verified )

So we have an entitled couple, with very close connections to more than one judge, a retired cop, and one of the judges has “considerable history”

The critical questions that should be asked though are 

1. How did William Willis get an essential worker document, he’s an equestrian with a hay cutting business on the side  ( Hannah Walmsley can because all criminal barristers get them automatically ) but someone fiddled the system to get William a pass….who did that, who signed that, and what’s on that document ?

2. who actually let them through the border and why ?, they can’t have had an urgent case south of the Bombay Hills

3. Who is the lady who was staying at the same house in Wanaka, she’s described as tallish, 5’11”, elegant, early sixties, with dark short hair

4. why didn’t they ‘fess up straight away ?

5. which District Court judge gave then interim suppression and what’s that judges relationship with Mary-Beth Sharp, if any 

I can’t help thinking there’s a lot left in this story yet 

 

Who cares about all that crap?  Hell it suits the Government to have all the minions and morons directing their attention to an elite couple rather than directing their wrath where it should lie.

How many of us have broken some of the Covid-19 rules and cast the first stone?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.