RaceCafe..#1...Tipsters Thread.... Share Your Fancies For Fun...Lets See Who The Best Tipsters Here Are.
Nerula

How about this?

Recommended Posts

Chairman George puts both feet in mouth simultaneously

http://www.theoptimist.site/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Cameron-George.jpg

Open wide so both feet can fit!

by Brian de Lore
 Published 23rd August 2021

NZTR Chairman Cameron George ended up with both feet in his mouth last Friday week by carelessly putting his mouth into gear while his brain was in neutral. The incident followed the board meeting of NZTR (New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing) at Riccarton Racecourse on the day before the running of the Grand National Steeplechase.

Shaun Clotworthy was present in the room unbeknown to George when CEO Bernard Saundry made it known to George that Clotworthy had been appointed the new President of the New Zealand Trainers’ Association.

Participating in the meeting via Zoom from Australia, Cameron George made a series of disparaging remarks about Shaun and his appointment – overheard by all in earshot, including Shaun Clotworthy. Saundry attempted to hush him up, but George didn’t twig and continued the tirade until Clotworthy came into camera view. Predictably, it then stopped but without any sign of embarrassment or apology from George.

Details of the incident became known to The Optimist neither from Shaun Clotworthy nor anyone on the board. But when something that crass occurs, it’s human nature for a spillage of the beans, and it came to these pages second-hand, but afterwards confirmed in a phone call to Shaun Clotworthy.

Why is Cameron George on the board of NZTR ?

It raises a couple of questions that people in racing were asking before this incident. Why is Cameron George on the board of NZTR, and why is he the Chair? He’s Australian and has spent the whole of 2021 living and working in Australia; how can he possibly do justice to a position that requires constant attention for an industry declining at an alarming rate.

How do industry participants draw any confidence from someone who behaves in this manner? Not only is it a low act, but why would the Chair of NZTR turn vitriolic about anyone’s appointment at the Trainers’ Association unless it’s someone unlikely to comply with the cartel or someone who might stand firm for the battlers in racing, or someone who might mobilise his members for a better deal than they’ve been getting. Shaun could be all of those.

Shaun and Emma Clotworthy have been great supporters of the racing industry for many years, as was Shaun’s father, Kim Clotworthy, before that, going back to the days of the champion colt, Uncle Remus. They are a highly respected racing family that will still be involved long after Cameron George is a forgotten name back in Australia.

The New Zealand racing industry faces numerous challenges without cowboy behaviour borne out of buffoonery, ego, or self-interest. This sort of stuff has been going on for too long. Nepotism has become the norm, evident by a recent appointment, and denialism about the state of the racing industry is endemic in the ranks of racing administrators and even more so in Government circles which, led by Minister of Racing Grant Robertson, has assumed ownership of the TAB.

Big budget increase for RIU

Here’s something you probably don’t know: While owners and trainers are eating the wallpaper off their walls (you already knew that), the newly appointed RIU (Racing Integrity Unit) Board have had a budget increase from $9 million last season to $14 million for this current season. Who’s paying? You are!

Why? Partly because they are employing four new animal welfare inspectors to make sure everyone is doing the correct thing in the eyes of the PC brigade and ‘the Greenies,’ and unlike the rest of the industry, the Minister sees the need to expand or strengthen its control according to the Racing Act 2020. Does the budget also allow for an upgrade in the quality of the single malt scotch in the boardroom liquor cabinet?

Have a look at the new RIU Board. Appointed by Minister Robertson is the Chair Sir Bruce Robertson, well advanced in years, a retired judge who has a sports background but devoid of racing knowledge;  Kristy McDonald QC, who has had her snout in the racing trough for years; Dr Patricia Pearce – vet and animal welfare; Brent Williams – ex JCA board member, and on the board of the NZ Egg producers Association; Penny Mudford, company director like the others, the veterinary council of NZ, Rural Woman NZ, and former Chair of the Racing Safety Development Fund Industry Working Group.

…stereotypical Government-appointed board 

This board ticks all the boxes of the modern, stereotypical Government-appointed board with gender equality, a high average age with a cushy retiree look, an all-but-one content of names with numerous letters attached, and a long history of ‘Institute of Directors’ experience. The only thing they lack is a deep knowledge of racing which they may say isn’t required.

Then add Chief Executive Mike Clement, a retired NZ Police Deputy Commissioner of 42 years service, and you have it all, at an estimated cost of $14 million for one year. Five years ago, in 2016, the Annual Report of NZRB listed the cost of the RIU at $5.8 million. In five seasons, that’s an increase of 240 percent.

In the same five years, the thoroughbred foal crop has dropped 30 percent, which on the face of it, says that this expansion of the RIU is a complete overkill. Is it a Government kneejerk reaction to a series of accusations made against the greyhound fraternity on animal welfare issues?

Back in April, Minister Robertson announced he was putting in place a review of animal welfare and safety in the greyhound racing industry. Robertson said, “I have informed Greyhound Racing NZ that I am not satisfied the recommendations are being implemented in a way that is improving animal welfare, and with their failure to provide sufficient information on changes they are making.”

Sir Bruce Robertson led the review 

Minister Robertson appointed Sir Bruce Robertson to lead the review, which was supposed to be completed by August 1st. As at August 23rd, nothing has been released, but it was very clear in April that the Government was most unhappy with the greyhound people led by recalcitrant CEO Glenda Hughes who failed to act upon a request for regular progress reports.

The Government press statement released jointly by Minister Robertson and Associate Agriculture Minister Meka Whaitiri didn’t mince words.

“It is the responsibility of the industry to hold itself accountable and ensure the best possible standards of welfare for greyhounds. Should the review show that progress has not been sufficient, a further fundamental look at the greyhound racing industry may be required,” Grant Robertson said.

If that wasn’t a clear enough warning, Whaitiri said, “I had written to Greyhound Racing New Zealand suggesting that they may wish to continue regular progress reporting on the recommendations from the Hansen Report. That suggestion was not acted on and this review will now address these matters.”

Attitudinal issues at Greyhound Racing NZ 

Attitudinal issues at Greyhound Racing NZ also resulted in the code having no representatives on the board of TAB NZ. The code nomination (Stephen Henry) was unacceptable to the Minister, and when asked to submit a new nomination, they resubmitted the same name, as did Harness Racing NZ (Shaun Brooks). Both codes dug a hole for themselves to advance an argument they were never going to win.

The unknown cost of the new Racing New Zealand Board which is in the process of having two independent directors appointed, likely to be mercenary graduates from the Institute of Directors, will add more strain to industry finances.

Then add the cost of the new position of Chief Operating Officer as 2IC to Bernard Saundry and, all things considered, this racing industry is carrying on as though it’s the 1980s and all is well, and they’re printing money like the Government.  

When the stake increases were announced by Bernard Saundry in July, he carried on as though we’d all won Lotto, and we should all be so grateful.

Spin doctor Bernard Saundry

Saundry said, “What a difference a year makes. Obviously, the owners will be the main beneficiaries. All levels will benefit. Of course, NZTR cannot take all the credit for the latest stake increases. There has been a concerted effort across the industry to reduce costs and we must acknowledge the substantial cost reductions achieved by TAB NZ”

Bernard, what planet did you come from? If you owned a few racehorses, you might come to your senses. The reality is the financial viability of the racing business is in freefall. You are right about a year making a difference – every year we fall further behind as the ratio of costs against potential returns worsens.

But you are also right about owners being the beneficiaries – that’s because they’re soon all heading to the dole queue at WINZ to get the benefit. And as for NZTR taking credit for the increases, there is no credit for you to take. You have put a paltry $2.2 million into the minimum stake to get it to $12,000, which is pathetic. Most of the NZTR board were against putting any money into the minimum because they wanted it all in the middle and top.

Every owner has to take their horse through the maiden and R65 class 

Every owner has to take their horse through the maiden and R65 class to get to the middle and top to stay alive in the ownership game. If you don’t feed the troops, you will have an army running on empty stomachs and losing the battle. What is it about understanding the fundamentals of racing that administrators in this country have lacked for decades?

All the added costs outlined above will virtually wipe out the $13 million Winston Peters got back with the two per cent betting levy in the 2020 budget. The $20 million we are supposedly getting back from ‘racefields’ or Betting Information User Charges has only made up for the shortfall in other areas, and the stake increases as mentioned above only apply between September and April and are three-monthly reviewable.

In review, what we now have in New Zealand racing is not dissimilar to what happened 16 years ago when Winston Peters in his first term as Racing Minister was able to help the industry by signing off the free tax rebate. It was worth $33 million to racing in the first year and recurred annually with incremental increases to the extent that it’s worth double that today.

NZRB grabbed most of the money for themselves

The problem was that from 2005, NZRB grabbed most of the money for themselves instead of it coming back to owners in stakes. For the next 12 years, NZRB expanded at a rate of knots, and the wages bill went from $27 million to $66 million (+149%). For the same period, stakes rose by only 51 percent. Racing became the punching bag for the Government of the day.

Well, it’s groundhog day. As soon as they’ve gathered some extra dollars again, it’s redirected elsewhere. It is sad to say that many racing administrators today don’t believe that pumping as much money into stakes as possible will enhance the industry – they apparently have learned nothing from Australia.

My figures say the foal crop will be down 14 percent this spring which can also be used as a barometer for ownership. In Australia, 63 percent of owners are breeders, and one would expect the stat would be similar in New Zealand.

Those lines on the graph will continue to decline in unison unless our spin doctor administrators recognise the reality of the industry’s demise and take drastic and positive action with a remedy plan. If they can’t, they should all resign.

Whatever way you look at it, the three codes and all subsidiary boards, and heavy-handed Government control, have taken this racing industry into a deeper state of the serious malaise described in the Messara Review three years ago.

Albert Einstein summed up the situation best a little longer than three years ago when he said:

“There are only two things that are infinite – the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the universe.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit,  if George wasn't currently running thoroughbred racing and someone came on here and said "I know, why don't we see if we can get the chap who's been in charge of the Warriors for years  to run Racing as well", everyone would look at them as if they were deranged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some have the courage and conviction to debate and inform an alternative position. I’m interested in not becoming a sheep that does not look at this puzzle in a balanced way. There have been many instances in history  where a fight of the most ginormous effort was needed to not become a sheep. So the debate must exist and there is no single answer but to not have the debate is to become a sheep…..and sheeps always get slaughtered….that is the definition of a sheep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really the guts of this, what is the benefit of having CG as the chair of NZTR. He lives in AUS, heads a second rate outfit and much of the board of NZTR link to that.

His previous role as a stipe has left him with un-professional bias against Shaun C leading him to shoot his mouth off. Shaun (a former accountant) is a good man.

IMO NZTA should advise "no confidence in CG" to the Minister of Racing and get the other sector groups to support that. Pretty sure they would.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, JJ Flash said:

With unbalanced rubbish like that its no wonder he does not get any reception from those in higher places.

Why not inform us of what's unbalanced?

message.. messenger?

There was mostly facts in the article, written in a very plain manner so all Dimwits could understand them. You should try harder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Phillipe said:

Why not inform us of what's unbalanced?

You for starters based on this semi attack of yours . 

 

18 hours ago, Nerula said:

It raises a couple of questions that people in racing were asking before this incident. Why is Cameron George on the board of NZTR, and why is he the Chair?

Geez Brian , do your homework , he is there because he was elected onto the board and in a spill, where Jackson departed, was elected Chair until i think its March 2022.

 

18 hours ago, Nerula said:

how can he possibly do justice to a position that requires constant attention for an industry declining at an alarming rate.

Have you not heard of Zoom and the number of major companies who use it regularly for Board meetings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gubellini said:

I have always found Brian de Lore's articles to be well researched and generally on the button.

Me too. He is pretty much the only person trying to hold incompetent management to account, and we are incredibly lucky have him. No one else is doing anything. I think most have given up, and you can hardly blame them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, JJ Flash said:

You for starters based on this semi attack of yours . 

 

Geez Brian , do your homework , he is there because he was elected onto the board and in a spill, where Jackson departed, was elected Chair until i think its March 2022.

 

Have you not heard of Zoom and the number of major companies who use it regularly for Board meetings.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am on a board and am very au fait with ZOOM meetings. In my view they are a poor substitute for actual meetings. They mostly degenerate into talkfests.

The essence is, is CG the right man for the job. JJ. F. I dont go hard at NZTR admin but I think the Board needs a refresh of people that are committed and present.

 It seems you are an apologist for them, why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Nerula said:

I am on a board and am very au fait with ZOOM meetings. In my view they are a poor substitute for actual meetings. They mostly degenerate into talkfests.

The essence is, is CG the right man for the job. JJ. F. I dont go hard at NZTR admin but I think the Board needs a refresh of people that are committed and present.

 It seems you are an apologist for them, why?

I can assure you i am no apologist as you put it for NZTR but some of the stuff written about them is unjustified. By all means attack individuals if that's your go in life but  my posts are based on trying to offer balance. Hence my above replies . If you think Brian is on the money by all means join his crusade for that's what it come across as . Me , i don't find his articles to be well researched  and thus i challenge his assertions. Some have suggested to me he is a yesterday's man who lacks cred. Based on some of his articles i can see why. 

That's my summation but as the industry is in a crisis i suppose its not unreasonable to expect everyone to be up in arms when an ex journo writes opinion pieces which border on fiction in places. Didnt NZTAB allocate the codes a record distribution of 170 mio this season or is that not worthy of comment by him. As i said earlier , i look for balance from journos, perhaps im just old fashioned

As an aside , it would be fascinating to see what he would come up with if he wrote a piece on the state of the Harness code. They really are a basket case IMO😃

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of us are yesterdays men but we might be wiser than todays men.

I am not a disciple of de Lore. I put the piece up in its entirety to see what people thought of it. He does put his head above the parapet though.

What part of de Lore article do you dispute. CG making a fool of himself? Surely not!

How about you address the other charges?

I support Saundry as I've found him an approachable bloke and he is cutting the poor cloth he is given as best he can.

As I have said before racing here is run in a communistic way. The Minister, his appointees and the politburo of the DIA, flunkeys, and then some trickle down to the serfs. Its unlikely to prosper until the clubs form hubs re-capitalise those themselves so they can have independence and some competition. That will bring new challenges when it happens here. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nerula said:

I am not a disciple of de Lore.

Nor me after doing a bit of reading on his site. 

Re GC, i think he's quite a clever bloke who calls a spade a spade so to speak. I'm not sure why BS would say the above to GC when SC was in such close proximity. Nonetheless it was bad form in this PC world to say what he said if true.

On 8/24/2021 at 3:27 PM, Nerula said:

The New Zealand racing industry faces numerous challenges without cowboy behaviour borne out of buffoonery, ego, or self-interest. This sort of stuff has been going on for too long. Nepotism has become the norm, evident by a recent appointment, and denialism about the state of the racing industry is endemic in the ranks of racing administrators and even more so in Government circles which, led by Minister of Racing Grant Robertson, has assumed ownership of the TAB.

How subjective is this especially the last bit and the nepotism piece. FFS, McKenzie now has absolutely no say in anything NZTR does, let alone its appointments and yet its brought up about  his previous commercial arrangement with BS a decade ago. Drawing a long bow surely ??

Its no wonder nobody bothers to engage with BDL , would you bother

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My tuppence worth

Firstly de Lore is a vituperative “gun for hire” journalist who has an agenda …and who apparently can’t deal with rejection

When I read this article I panicked as I consider both Shaun & Camo as friends, both are good at their job, and they should be working together 

I took the liberty of ringing one of them to see if I could help reconcile any differences, but he laughed it off and said it was prearranged and the two had had and useful chats subsequently 

There’s no bad blood there….end of story

Meantime NZTR looks as good as it’s ever looked, and the TA should be well served by a “no bullshit” chief like Shaun Clotworthy 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, poundforpound said:

and who apparently can’t deal with rejection

And he's been getting it from those at the top of the tree for quite some time. 

 

50 minutes ago, poundforpound said:

I took the liberty of ringing one of them to see if I could help reconcile any differences, but he laughed it off and said it was prearranged

SO might BDL have got it all wrong - again. Make up your own mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nerula said:

JJ. F I would appreciate you not ascribing words to me that I did not write. Please don't copy and paste words of others as if I said them.

Understood but i was only answering questions you put to me. But pulling the answer from BDL's sermon was unavoidable if i was to respond. Im sure others can see what you post and what BDL writes as being completely separate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, scooby3051 said:

So JJ if they are doing such a good job why have the salaries and running costs shot up by around 500K a year this upcoming year???

 

6 hours ago, JJ Flash said:

I can assure you i am no apologist as you put it for NZTR

I have never said at any point that they are doing a good job. I remain neutral on that front but from a governance point of view i much rather prefer the current board and its structure than that of Carter and Jackson 

Further, I have no idea re the increased operational costs. We will all have to wait for the end of year financials to ascertain what was spent where and  the value or otherwise of  the increased expenditure.

I do agree though  that this is a very important question and will likely bring out a multiplicity of responses/opinions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.