DONT FORGET SUPERSTARS OF THE SPRING ENTRIES THIS COMING COX PLATE WEEKEND !!!!!
JJ Flash

M Kerr Press Article

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Eastwood Jaunty said:

And I should add - he actually isn't a lawyer, just one of those types who did a one-week course at Northlands Mall on dispute resolution and then sells himself as a lawyer to people he thinks he can hoodwink.  

Actually 6 Years at Massey University and another 3 at Manash Univesristy in Melbourne. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Eastwood Jaunty said:

And I should add - he actually isn't a lawyer, just one of those types who did a one-week course at Northlands Mall on dispute resolution and then sells himself as a lawyer to people he thinks he can hoodwink.  

Should be on the same page at Mr M Kerr  then  A good match.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure they had much choice given the gravity of the offending and his failure to attend the hearing and give them any reason to give a more lenient sentence.  That said, I do sincerely hope that he gets the help he needs to defeat his issues and that happier days lie ahead for him and all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/29/2021 at 9:14 PM, harewood said:

Should be on the same page at Mr M Kerr  then  A good match.

Sorry for not responding earlier was busy with my prosecution of my  "ONE" Case ( 15 hours work for $28k fees. Fortunately for her(the defendant) she didnt get the maximum 27 year s behind bars) in the court. Now its time to go fishing  setting the burley to catch you disckheads again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, kilcoyne said:

Sorry for not responding earlier was busy with my prosecution of my  "ONE" Case ( 15 hours work for $28k fees. Fortunately for her(the defendant) she didnt get the maximum 27 year s behind bars) in the court. Now its time to go fishing  setting the burley to catch you disckheads again

Group 1 FLOG 

Learn to spell dickhead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, kilcoyne said:

Sorry for not responding earlier was busy with my prosecution of my  "ONE" Case ( 15 hours work for $28k fees. Fortunately for her(the defendant) she didnt get the maximum 27 year s behind bars) in the court. Now its time to go fishing  setting the burley to catch you disckheads again

very rare that anyone gets the maximum is it ..... getting her off may have been something to crow about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, chelseacol said:

very rare that anyone gets the maximum is it ..... getting her off may have been something to crow about

Would’ve thought faced with the prospect of 27 years prison you’d expect more than 15 hours work from your solicitor for 28k in fees. Possibly was expecting to qualify for the renowned Kendra Law “No win No fee” service........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MiDeBo Racing said:

Would’ve thought faced with the prospect of 27 years prison you’d expect more than 15 hours work from your solicitor for 28k in fees. Possibly was expecting to qualify for the renowned Kendra Law “No win No fee” service........

You need to read the contract. everyone pays eventually

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, MiDeBo Racing said:

Would’ve thought faced with the prospect of 27 years prison you’d expect more than 15 hours work from your solicitor for 28k in fees. Possibly was expecting to qualify for the renowned Kendra Law “No win No fee” service........

He's a fraud will tell you what you want to hear then not reply to your calls,emails or text then months later tell you "SORRY" i cant help you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mouse1 said:
17 hours ago, MiDeBo Racing said:

Would’ve thought faced with the prospect of 27 years prison you’d expect more than 15 hours work from your solicitor for 28k in fees. Possibly was expecting to qualify for the renowned Kendra Law “No win No fee” service........

He's a fraud will tell you what you want to hear then not reply to your calls,emails or text then months later tell you "SORRY" i cant help you.

I was always of the opinion that Crown Prosecutors and Police on lower level charges did the prosecution thing in court This seems at odds with his comments below

 

On 4/15/2021 at 7:05 PM, kilcoyne said:

Sorry for not responding earlier was busy with my prosecution of my  "ONE" Case ( 15 hours work for $28k fees. Fortunately for her(the defendant) she didnt get the maximum 27 year s behind bars) in the court.

All semantics perhaps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/15/2021 at 7:05 PM, kilcoyne said:

Sorry for not responding earlier was busy with my prosecution of my  "ONE" Case ( 15 hours work for $28k fees. Fortunately for her(the defendant) she didnt get the maximum 27 year s behind bars) in the court. Now its time to go fishing  setting the burley to catch you disckheads again

Don’t have the case number by chance? Fascinated to read further about your prosecution or defence. Whichever one it was. Thanks in advance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MiDeBo Racing said:

Don’t have the case number by chance? Fascinated to read further about your prosecution or defence. Whichever one it was. Thanks in advance

{2020 MPC 6/2021}NZERA426 3074412.   EMPC 345/2020,   EMPC 6/2021🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MiDeBo Racing said:

Where does 27 years imprisonment come into a PG dispute between a towing company and a former employee?? 

Its called criminal behaviour

Filing time sheets claiming to be doing work for 6 months (89 times) when they werent doing anything and claiming payment. Its called using a document for percunary (sic) advantage along with a few other things she did. Max sentence 10 years s 255 Crimes Act 1961.

7 years for s 249 Crimes Act 1961 (usig computer for dishonest purpose,

15 times 241 Crimes act 1961, obtaining by deception (3 yrs each)

15 times Theft of Documents and trade secrets s 228 and 230 (total 8 years)

Theft by person in special relationship s 220 7 years.

s 216 attempting to obtain recording devices without warrant 2 years.

Cummulative total over 1000 years but we may accept representative charges and make it one count of each + around 27 years. No ankle tie and home detention for that long 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.