RaceCafe..#1...Tipsters Thread.... Share Your Fancies For Fun...Lets See Who The Best Tipsters Here Are.
tripple alliance

Global Warming / Climate Change

Recommended Posts

heres something interesting...

not sure if anyone is aware of the  "THINK TANK" called action station, it has become a left leaning political arm masquerading as a voice of the people...

the questionaires leave little room for Principled thinking.. rather move toward a progressive madness.

BE AWARE!! STAY ALERT!!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

heres is a little excerpt from a email i received from Action Station

 

If you notice that there is a candidate who fits the criteria that we have missed, please send us an email at info@actionstation.org.nz and we’ll be sure to add them to the mix! 

And while elections are an important way for us to use our power as voters, it’s important for us to use our power as workers and citizens too. 

This Friday, tens of thousands of students and young people are leading a strike demanding businesses and government take swift and decisive climate action. Already millions of people around the globe have marched on the streets.2

Will you join them? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how you handle persecution by this government , it's time rural NZ stood their ground . Rural NZ Is  under attack , it wouldn't take much to get organized and do this .

  ''  Tractor-driving farmers taking to the streets to demand greater recognition have caused the worst ever Dutch morning rush hour on Tuesday, according to motoring organisation ANWB.

There were 1,136km (700 miles) of jams at the morning peak, it said.

Farmers reacted angrily to claims that they were largely responsible for a nitrogen oxide emissions problem . A report has called for inefficient cattle farms to be shut down .  Thousands of farmers, many on their tractors , took part in the protest in a field in the centre of The Hague. Police said 2,200 farmers joined the protest.  

Every farmer felt the same frustration, that their industry was being targeted by a government scrambling to hit its climate goals. 

If the government wants to avoid the farmers' wrath, it must ensure that lucrative businesses such as motor-racing, airports and multinationals are subject to equal scrutiny.  

As the tractors headed home the main infrastructure agency warned of major disruption for the evening rush hour too. ''

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greta Thunberg's speech to UN strangely resembles a 1992 UN speech by 12-year-old Severn Cullis-Suzuki

Well, at least the climate hysterics are practicing recycling.  Or repeating a pattern of child abuse, exploiting young minds and souls for their political benefit, if you will.  Or maybe it is just a matter of running out of ideas and realizing that since they are peddling fear, nobody could better instill alarm than a threatened, vulnerable child.

Whatever the motives, it is clear that Miss Thunberg's publicity stunt ocean voyage (on a royal yacht) and appearance at the U.N. was following a script written more than a quarter-century ago.  And it is no secret.  This 1992 video of then-12-year-old Severn Cullis-Suzuki addressing the U.N. Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, titled "The girl who silenced the world for 5 minutes," has had almost 32 million views on YouTube:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great last  post RDYTDY and have a read of this , I bet the media don't publish or discuss either of these issues .

'' '' Lost amid the coverage of Swedish teen activist Greta Thunberg at last week’s U.N. Global Climate Summit were the 500 international scientists, engineers and other stakeholders sounding a very different message: “There is no climate emergency.”  

The European Climate Declaration, spearheaded by the Amsterdam-based Climate Intelligence Foundation [CLINTEL], described the leading climate models as “unfit” and urged UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to pursue a climate policy based on “sound science.” 

“Current climate policies pointlessly and grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, reliable electrical energy,” said the Sept. 23 letter signed by professionals from 23 countries. “We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” the letter said.

The signers asked Mr. Guterres to place the declaration on the UN’s agenda for the meeting ending Monday—which hasn’t happened—and organize a meeting of scientists “on both sides of the climate debate early in 2020.”

I will add to this , if some sanity isn't applied to this climate madness and children continue to be bombarded with this bullshit then the suicide rate amongst the younger generation in the next few years will skyrocket , PARENTS PAY ATTENTION your children are in danger .

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gruff said:

Q has inferred that the hurricanes have been manufactured by the deep state for years so they could get their grubby hands on the aid money and in some cases traffic the children.(Haiti)

 Interestingly the most recent hurricane Dorian was stationary for days (unusual) proving team Trump is now in control.of the HAARP system.

Same with the Californian fires started with DEW weapons so they receive central govt aid...drain the swamp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went for a long walk on Tugan, Bilinga and Kirra Beaches yesterday. I do this twice a week. There’s so much sand there you could land a jumbo jet on it. So much for Coastal erosion! Yesterday, a Climate Change nutcase and his unemployed friends, glued and bolted themselves to a busy road. After cutting them free, the ringleader has been “banned” from the City of Brisbane precinct and two have had their dole payments terminated. Anyone disrupting traffic from now on is going to have their dole scrapped. Good on PM Morrison. I wonder if Ardern would do the same in NZ? A motorist in Sydney yesterday was blocked by climate change nutters dressed up as clowns etc. he got out of his car and started throwing their shit away and pushing them away so he could get on with his life! The dickhead in Brisbane is being hailed by his parents ffs. They should be charged just like he has been. His fines are mounting and jail is next. That’s one thing I do like about China. They’d be thrown into an obscure mine in Mongolia and never be seen or heard of again. It’s time to beat the shit out of these lunatics! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2019 at 9:22 AM, Trump said:

I went for a long walk on Tugan, Bilinga and Kirra Beaches yesterday. I do this twice a week. There’s so much sand there you could land a jumbo jet on it. So much for Coastal erosion! Yesterday, a Climate Change nutcase and his unemployed friends, glued and bolted themselves to a busy road. After cutting them free, the ringleader has been “banned” from the City of Brisbane precinct and two have had their dole payments terminated. Anyone disrupting traffic from now on is going to have their dole scrapped. Good on PM Morrison. I wonder if Ardern would do the same in NZ? A motorist in Sydney yesterday was blocked by climate change nutters dressed up as clowns etc. he got out of his car and started throwing their shit away and pushing them away so he could get on with his life! The dickhead in Brisbane is being hailed by his parents ffs. They should be charged just like he has been. His fines are mounting and jail is next. That’s one thing I do like about China. They’d be thrown into an obscure mine in Mongolia and never be seen or heard of again. It’s time to beat the shit out of these lunatics! 

Can you blame People? It’s time Media outlets are made accountable for spreading propaganda along with Schools. This isn’t going away , the stupid youth and ignorant have been warned about ‘conspiracy theories and deniers ‘ and don’t even want to hear anything to the contrary. I’ve been trying to spread the word but people don’t like their ‘opinions’ being questioned.... where are they getting their facts? Balance in a debate is tough when they have been exposed to a particular narrative, Arnold Schwarzenegger’s got an IQ of 135 and still he’s backing the Moaning Minnie:rcfe-happy-3: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

''' Climate change "rebels" from Extinction Rebellion practice a "die-in" at a Kāpiti Coast campsite ahead of protest action in Wellington City on Monday. 

About 40 bodies of men, women and children are lying motionless in a paddock beneath a sky that threatens to pour any moment. 

Wellington is the first of more than 60 cities worldwide targeted for climate activist disruption in what has been called a "global rebellion" by Extinction Rebellion, an international anti-climate change movement.

At Saturday's camp, Extinction Rebellion spokeswoman Dr Sea Rottman wouldn't reveal the group's plan, but said they would be drawing the line on climate change. .

"There's going to be some relatively serious disruption, but we're going to try and minimise the disruption to the working public as much as possible."

She wanted to make it clear the group was sorry for what the public would experience on Monday.'''

Wouldn't it be interesting if the odd foot slipped off the brake , sooner or later some ones going to get hurt .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gruff said:

Can you blame People? It’s time Media outlets are made accountable for spreading propaganda along with Schools. This isn’t going away , the stupid youth and ignorant have been warned about ‘conspiracy theories and deniers ‘ and don’t even want to hear anything to the contrary. I’ve been trying to spread the word but people don’t like their ‘opinions’ being questioned.... where are they getting their facts? Balance in a debate is tough when they have been exposed to a particular narrative, Arnold Schwarzenegger’s got an IQ of 135 and still he’s backing the Moaning Minnie:rcfe-happy-3: 

Don't worry Gruff the globalist climate change scam is going to be exposed by team Trump.

They have let the idiots/criminals hang themselves now EVERYTHING is being exposed.

Thousands of people will be arrested while millions are going to feel really stupid then mad....it will be spectacular

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Gruff said:

One of the best clips out there:rcfe-like:

yea its froms the sky news australia channel on youtube

its quite a revealing channel where the anchors are very sensible down to earth..(call out BS)

very pro-trump.. which is refreshing from watching the usual Fox news channel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cult_-1068x712.jpg

The Climate Cult

Dr. Jay Lehr and Burt Prelutsky

PA Pundits

It is a phenomenon of modern life that as membership in the old established religions wane, cults continue to sprout up like toadstools. Most of them have a very limited number of adherents and unless 75 people are killed at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, or 900 are killed or commit suicide at Jonestown, Guyana, we don’t hear about cult leaders like David Koresh or Jim Jones.

Occasionally, a smaller cult manages to make the news when they commit mass suicide in order to board a spaceship that will take them to Cloud Cuckooland.

But when it comes to sheer numbers and influence, there’s nothing to match the doomsday cult that has sprung up in the wake of Al Gore’s warning us about the imminent threat of global extinction. What makes the longevity of this cult so remarkable is that Gore’s “imminent” has turned into “eventual” and none of the true believers is questioning the ever-changing timetable. The cause of addressing climate change has become the modern world’s version of a secular religion.

There has long been a church of environmentalism having many of the characteristics of its ecclesiastical forerunners. One of course is the apocalypse that will consume us all if we do not follow the rules. The rules involve making penance for our original sin of unleashing the earth’s carbon dioxide emitting fuels from the Earth’s crust, and more recent transgressions involving plastic straws and cross country airline flights. But repentance is near. Salvation lies in eliminating our “carbon footprint”, using reusable shopping bags, and supporting MacDonald’ new meatless hamburgers.

The folks who espouse the climate change gospel know little more about the science of climatology and the greenhouse effect, than the average medieval villager knew why crops may fail or the sun and moon become eclipsed. And in complete symmetry of past religions, children are being used as effective role models in propagating faith. Millions left school to urge adults to battle this modern scourge, or perhaps they just enjoyed a day off school to speak the lines they were taught.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal on September 21, 2019, Gerald Baker wrote:”the testimony of a guileless child is a powerful weapon against skepticism.” Sixteen-year-old Greta Thunberg has become the poster child for the religious fervour among climate change activists growing fanaticism.

Recently, A O-C and a few of the dimwits running for the Democratic nomination warned us that 2030 is absolutely the last day that this planet will be able to sustain human life. We bet confidently that by 2025, they’ll move the deadline to 2040.

Even Gore was something of a late bloomer. Starting around 1974, all the experts at the U.N., NASA, the New York Times, the AP, Time and Newsweek, were warning us of a coming Ice Age or fretting about a disappearing ozone layer or something really scary-sounding they called acid rain.

But, then, almost overnight, they regrouped and started keeping us up nights by screaming that the planet was in immediate danger of being incinerated.

When neither of those calamitous changes in the weather took place, the same folks decided to settle for a changing climate. The fact that they never explained what would be so terrible about things cooling down a little in the San Fernando Valley in California in July or warming up a bit in Fargo North Dakota in December should tell people all they really need to know about these cheap hustlers, who are in it for money, power and attention

2048px-Snake-oil_salesman_Professor_Thad

Gore warned of melting icebergs and rising ocean levels, which simply proved that he didn’t even remember his high school science. If you fill a glass with water and ice to the very top, when the ice melts, not a drop of water will rise above the rim.

It’s now twenty years later, the ice at the North Pole and South Poles haven’t vanished. If anything, they have expanded. As has Al Gore, if you’ve seen him lately.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

180816-tsunami-climate-change-02-1068x70Lushing D Brady

Climate Change: Reality vs Apocalyptic Rhetoric

Listening to the apocalyptic shrieking of the Klimate Kids and the Extinction Rebellion nutters, it is clear that they are not staggeringly ignorant of “the science” they fetishise, but completely and utterly divorced from anything approaching reality.

Like old-fashioned fire-and-brimstone preachers, scowling teenagers rant about the fire, tribulation and wailing and teeth-gnashing which awaits us climate sinners. But the strictly empirical evidence to date is that the mild warming of the 20th century has been extremely beneficial. The world has greened, fires have declined dramatically, natural disasters like cyclones have decreased, droughts have remained stable or decreased, and food is ever-more abundant.

Those are the facts. Not “projections”, but hard, empirical data.

The concern over climate change is not so much about the warming that has occurred over the past century. Rather, the concern is about projections of 21st century climate change based on climate model simulations of human-caused global warming, particularly those driven by the RCP8.5 greenhouse gas concentration scenario.

Simulations and models should never, ever be confused with empirical data, let alone regarded as hard facts. And certainly not models which are “useless pieces of junk or worse…when they are used for climate forecasting”.

Politicians, media, and half-educated children, with scarcely even the most rudimentary grasp of such science basics, are easy, gullible targets for propaganda. Unfortunately, they’re being fed a steady diet of propaganda and told it’s “science” – and they believe it.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports have focused on assessing a likely range (>66% probability) for projections in response to different emissions concentration pathways. Oppenheimer et al. (2007) contends that the emphasis on consensus in IPCC reports has been on expected outcomes, which then become anchored via numerical estimates in the minds of policy makers.

In other words, IPCC reports “project” that, on a worst-case scenario, temperatures might rise by 3 or more degrees. This is filtered through politicians and media, to become: “temperatures are going to rise by 3 degrees!” Gullible, terrified children amplify that to “We’re all going to die!”

It’s a spectacularly idiotic outbreak of the madness of crowds, fuelled by a steady avalanche of ideologically-amped Chinese whispers.

In an influential paper, Weitzman (2009) argued that climate policy should be directed at reducing the risks of worst-case outcomes, not at balancing the most likely values of costs and benefits. Ackerman (2017) has argued that policy should be based on the credible worst-case outcome.

This is utter nonsense. There’s a worst-case possibility that Earth could be invaded by hostile aliens at any given time. Would anyone argue seriously that we must therefore, spend everything we can building giant space-laser defences to fend off the alien invasion?

Of course, the alien invasion scenario is barely credible. But then, so is climate catastrophism.

The issue then becomes how to judge what is ‘credible.’ It has been argued here that a useful criterion for a plausible (credible) worst-case climate outcome is that at most one borderline implausible assumption – defined as an assumption where experts disagree as to whether or not it is plausible – is included in developing the scenario.

[…]The largest rates of warming that are often cited in impact assessment analyses (e.g. 4.5 or 5 oC) rely on climate models being driven by a borderline implausible concentration/emission scenarios…Even the more moderate amount of warming of 3.1oC relies on climate models with values of the equilibrium climate sensitivity that are larger than can be defended based on analysis of historical climate change.

[…]The most extreme of the published worst-case scenarios require a cascade of events, each of which are extremely unlikely to borderline impossible based on our current knowledge base.

judithcurry.com/2019/08/22/climate-change-whats-the-worst-case/

In other words, the science is not “crystal clear”. In fact, the catastrophist fantasies of idiot children and green politicians (tautology?) have no evidential basis whatsoever.

“Climate emergencies” are nonsense on the tallest, most rickety stilts imaginable.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.