Spikecity 749 Report post Posted August 7, 2018 2nd and 3rd horses dividends obviously subsidized the winners. 6 Im Anothermasterpiec Mark Purdon 1.20 1.00 7 Ballachulish Robert Morris 1.60 4 Times Stride Darren Binskin 2.40 Bet Type Runners Dividend Quinella 6, 7 3.60 Trifecta 6:7:4 12.20 First4 6:7:4:8 39.30 Double 7/6 1.00 DBL concession 7/7 6.00 Treble 1/7/6 10.10 Quaddie 5/1/7/6 6.60 1 3274X Hot Flush (1) Kerryann Turner 21.00 2.35 19.00 9.00 2 62177 Besocial (2) Todd McCarthy 71.00 5.75 62.60 26.20 3 13853 Sounds Of Terror (3) Mat Rue 31.00 3.25 25.00 9.30 4 75X47 Times Stride (4) Darren Binskin 26.00 2.80 22.90 6.30 5 15666 Gentle Giant (5) Colin McDowell 41.00 4.00 45.90 20.10 6 11211 Im Anothermasterpiec (6) Mark Purdon 1.12 1.03 1.20 0.30 7 X57X4 Ballachulish (7) Robert Morris 8.00 1.30 5.30 4.30 8 16770 Homeland (U1) Chris Geary (C) 23.00 2.50 30.00 12.30 Fartoomuch 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fartoomuch 1,376 Report post Posted August 7, 2018 Great win money, its won Grp1's and 260K the next best has won 3 races and 25K. All those who say about selling to oz cos they cant compete etc find themselves in familiar territory Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sickopunter 403 Report post Posted August 7, 2018 Change this to what? Don’t you think paying out 30c on the dollar on a winning bet would be a lot more damaging? Newmarket RC 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spikecity 749 Report post Posted August 7, 2018 15 minutes ago, Sickopunter said: Change this to what? Don’t you think paying out 30c on the dollar on a winning bet would be a lot more damaging? No I don't - you know the odds and if you want risk getting sub $1 so be it - obviously a rebate bet with the rest of the punters subsidizing the rebate Newmarket RC 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sickopunter 403 Report post Posted August 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Spikecity said: No I don't - you know the odds and if you want risk getting sub $1 so be it - obviously a rebate bet with the rest of the punters subsidizing the rebate Would cripple the betting on such races if this happened and we cant have that. And while you may suggest that people know the odds many wouldn’t. Using your argument you could also argue people should know that when a horse is bet into well under a dollar and rounded up that it will impact the other runners. Newmarket RC 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newmarket RC 209 Report post Posted August 7, 2018 As this is a continuing annoyance to many what do you think would be the outcome if there was no make up to the dollar for any punters on pari mutual betting.. Is it an option/solution to the rebate issue Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickel 45 Report post Posted August 8, 2018 Any subsidy is clearly coming from the large amount of money bet on the favourite to place, this is Subsidisng the inflated Place divs for the rest of the field if the favourite doesn’t Place. This subsidy is made obvious in NZ with the raw dividend of 30c being advertised everywhere. In Australia ( including Live approximates on SKY ) the favourite’s Place div is advertised at $1.00 so you’ve got no idea how low it really is. However in these instances, because the TAB puts back all of its takeout first, before taking back the subsidies from the other placegetters, anyone backing the other placegetters gets MORE than they would have otherwise, without the splurge on the favourite. Fartoomuch 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
