RaceCafe..#1...Tipsters Thread.... Share Your Fancies For Fun...Lets See Who The Best Tipsters Here Are.
Guest

Jacinda Ardern

Recommended Posts

Now now jack comrade cindy , saved zero lives and in fact may have killed cancer patients with delayed diagnosis .

cindy is the 5th choice 

9 years of brilliant Nat government , managed the CH CH  quake , GFC . and we still prospered , not like comrade cindys pet project , reducing child poverty , IT had DOUBLED under her management and that's pre covid 

climate , comrade cindys nuclear moment , ZERO achieved .

Dirty politics , now pay attention , last night I was talking to a labour party branch Mino , he was putting it around a certain fisherman had created a bump on his travels , the purpose of this was to  put it out there and hope the Nat's would run with it , the story was ridiculous to anyone who thought it through but this lot were trying to trap a Nat at the expense of our fisherman and his better half , now that's dirty politics .

Open boarders , yes that's comrade cindys desire , one world socialist government .

Cut Cut  , NAH Judith  just guaranteed no benefit cuts .

Ignores science , really , what science is that there are so many different scientific opinions on most contentious issues .

Wants power , name me a politician who doesn't .

I'LL ignore the F OFF , it shows a lack of class .

THANK YOU 

very much .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/18/2020 at 8:33 AM, tripple alliance said:

Ah the beginning of desperation , left wing dirty politics in action , another good sign will be when lefty demonstrators start turning up shouting and  screaming at National party meetings , its going to happen .

When the next poll shows the race getting much closer the panic will set in . RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT gone , that's a great start .

And here go and we have along way to go but the fist signs of desperation , look out when the new poll comes out in a couple of weeks .

A complaint has been laid with police after Labour volunteers were spotted taking down New Conservative election hoardings in Auckland.

But Labour says it was a misunderstanding and a signs coordinator has apologised.

Of course it was a misunderstanding. I mean, they just tripped up and accidentally tore the signs down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Willy Nilly

Willy Jackson Shows His Racist Side

By Christie

 

I have been described as an “idiot” for saying this, but I really do think Labour, and the left in general, are running scared of Judith Collins. The latest cab off the rank is Willy Jackson. In a Facebook post, rather too well written for anyone to believe that he wrote it himself, he describes his feelings about the prospect of Judith Collins becoming prime minister, and as you might expect, he was not kind.

I’ve worked with Judith Collins for almost a year on The AM Show’s political panel so have a very good idea of her nature as a politician and because of that, I am redoubling my energies to ensure she doesn’t become the Prime Minister.Don’t get me wrong, Judith is great talent for TV political panels and I have enjoyed working with her. Her sharp wit and put downs are the perfect mix for Breakfast TV shock jocks, but New Zealand doesn’t need a quick witted sarcastic entertainer as Prime Minister right now, we need someone who can make difficult decisions in real time with empathy, insight and kindness and of course that’s Jacinda not Judith.

Judith is capable of making difficult decisions in real time (?) with insight, but I think what Jackson means is that Judith is not a hugger. But let’s face it, we need a prime minister who can make decisions; not simply hug people. Jacinda might be “kind” but she is incapable of making tough decisions, such as sacking her health minister when he broke the rules and failed spectacularly to do his job. He had to sack himself. So did Clare Curran.

 

We don’t need a PM like Judith with her legacy of dirty politics scandals, and we don’t need a PM who has a very casual attitude towards the treaty and comes up with ridiculous lines like “is there something wrong with me being white”. She knows how stupid and racially divisive that comment is but she says it deliberately to attract the anti treaty, anti Maori right wing vote.

Is there something wrong with being white? Judith is just asking a question that many of us wonder about. The majority of New Zealanders come from a European ethnicity and we are frequently treated as if there is something wrong with that. Jackson is actually being extremely racist and divisive himself here, rather than Judith, but that’s okay, of course, as he is a Maori.

The ironic part of course is that she is not a raving racist or redneck but more the politician who will do anything and say anything to get her team across the line.

Just as Jacinda will do or say anything to get her team across the line, Willy.

We need a Prime Minister who can run New Zealand for all of us, but Judith is a ‘Us-Them’ type of politician.

Judith, who has a Maori at number 4 in her caucus and has just promoted Shane Reti to her front bench, is an Us-Them politician? It doesn’t seem so to me, but then again, Judith appoints people on merit rather than gender or skin colour, which makes her team much more powerful than Jacinda’s. Labour’s policy of using quotas for women and non-white people has resulted in a front bench almost completely bereft of talent, and it shows.

In the wake of Covid and the pandemic we need a PM who can reach across the broken edges of society and bring everyone together, Jacinda does that to the point whereby we feel pride at her leadership.

I feel absolutely no pride in Jacinda’s leadership. I think she is a lightweight, incompetent politician in charge of what is essentially a bunch of fools, albeit a diverse bunch of fools. Her idea of leadership is photo opportunities and hugs.

cartoon-The_BFD-SonovaMIn-stormy-sea.jpg The BFD. Cartoon credit SonovaMin.

I believe Judith winning the election would be a disaster for New Zealand. Her divisive political instincts was the reason why she could never win the national leadership and is why John Key never supported her.

John Key was caught in a difficult place in 2014 because the media’s pursuit of Collins was becoming a major distraction from the upcoming election. While Judith has expressed disappointment about her treatment at the time, she has bounced back and I read somewhere that she has had a call from John Key in the past week. That sounds as if he is supporting her now.

Everyone who has been impressed by Jacinda and have felt taller for her leadership need to rally now to the cause to ensure a second term, because a first term of Judith Collins would be as culturally shocking to us as Trump’s victory in America.We need builders, not dividers. Jacinda is a builder, Judith is a divider.

Ah yes. The inevitable comparison to Trump. It had to come, I suppose. He repeatedly calls Judith a “divider” but gives no explanation for his claim. I see no reason to call her a “divider”. She is decisive, yes, and has a sharp wit, can think on her feet a million times faster than Jacinda, and models herself on Margaret Thatcher. Does any of that make her “divisive”?

We never heard any of this when Todd Muller became National leader. We can hardly expect anything else from Labour, of course. Everyone runs to Jacinda’s aid because she is so hopeless. Trevor Mallard has her back in the house, expelling people who ask her hard questions. But we need a prime minister who is not a damsel in distress. We need someone who can stand up for themselves. Jacinda cannot, but Judith can.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rdytdy said:

Willy Nilly

Willy Jackson Shows His Racist Side

By Christie

 

I have been described as an “idiot” for saying this, but I really do think Labour, and the left in general, are running scared of Judith Collins. The latest cab off the rank is Willy Jackson. In a Facebook post, rather too well written for anyone to believe that he wrote it himself, he describes his feelings about the prospect of Judith Collins becoming prime minister, and as you might expect, he was not kind.

I’ve worked with Judith Collins for almost a year on The AM Show’s political panel so have a very good idea of her nature as a politician and because of that, I am redoubling my energies to ensure she doesn’t become the Prime Minister.Don’t get me wrong, Judith is great talent for TV political panels and I have enjoyed working with her. Her sharp wit and put downs are the perfect mix for Breakfast TV shock jocks, but New Zealand doesn’t need a quick witted sarcastic entertainer as Prime Minister right now, we need someone who can make difficult decisions in real time with empathy, insight and kindness and of course that’s Jacinda not Judith.

Judith is capable of making difficult decisions in real time (?) with insight, but I think what Jackson means is that Judith is not a hugger. But let’s face it, we need a prime minister who can make decisions; not simply hug people. Jacinda might be “kind” but she is incapable of making tough decisions, such as sacking her health minister when he broke the rules and failed spectacularly to do his job. He had to sack himself. So did Clare Curran.

 

We don’t need a PM like Judith with her legacy of dirty politics scandals, and we don’t need a PM who has a very casual attitude towards the treaty and comes up with ridiculous lines like “is there something wrong with me being white”. She knows how stupid and racially divisive that comment is but she says it deliberately to attract the anti treaty, anti Maori right wing vote.

Is there something wrong with being white? Judith is just asking a question that many of us wonder about. The majority of New Zealanders come from a European ethnicity and we are frequently treated as if there is something wrong with that. Jackson is actually being extremely racist and divisive himself here, rather than Judith, but that’s okay, of course, as he is a Maori.

The ironic part of course is that she is not a raving racist or redneck but more the politician who will do anything and say anything to get her team across the line.

Just as Jacinda will do or say anything to get her team across the line, Willy.

We need a Prime Minister who can run New Zealand for all of us, but Judith is a ‘Us-Them’ type of politician.

Judith, who has a Maori at number 4 in her caucus and has just promoted Shane Reti to her front bench, is an Us-Them politician? It doesn’t seem so to me, but then again, Judith appoints people on merit rather than gender or skin colour, which makes her team much more powerful than Jacinda’s. Labour’s policy of using quotas for women and non-white people has resulted in a front bench almost completely bereft of talent, and it shows.

In the wake of Covid and the pandemic we need a PM who can reach across the broken edges of society and bring everyone together, Jacinda does that to the point whereby we feel pride at her leadership.

I feel absolutely no pride in Jacinda’s leadership. I think she is a lightweight, incompetent politician in charge of what is essentially a bunch of fools, albeit a diverse bunch of fools. Her idea of leadership is photo opportunities and hugs.

cartoon-The_BFD-SonovaMIn-stormy-sea.jpg The BFD. Cartoon credit SonovaMin.

I believe Judith winning the election would be a disaster for New Zealand. Her divisive political instincts was the reason why she could never win the national leadership and is why John Key never supported her.

John Key was caught in a difficult place in 2014 because the media’s pursuit of Collins was becoming a major distraction from the upcoming election. While Judith has expressed disappointment about her treatment at the time, she has bounced back and I read somewhere that she has had a call from John Key in the past week. That sounds as if he is supporting her now.

Everyone who has been impressed by Jacinda and have felt taller for her leadership need to rally now to the cause to ensure a second term, because a first term of Judith Collins would be as culturally shocking to us as Trump’s victory in America.We need builders, not dividers. Jacinda is a builder, Judith is a divider.

Ah yes. The inevitable comparison to Trump. It had to come, I suppose. He repeatedly calls Judith a “divider” but gives no explanation for his claim. I see no reason to call her a “divider”. She is decisive, yes, and has a sharp wit, can think on her feet a million times faster than Jacinda, and models herself on Margaret Thatcher. Does any of that make her “divisive”?

We never heard any of this when Todd Muller became National leader. We can hardly expect anything else from Labour, of course. Everyone runs to Jacinda’s aid because she is so hopeless. Trevor Mallard has her back in the house, expelling people who ask her hard questions. But we need a prime minister who is not a damsel in distress. We need someone who can stand up for themselves. Jacinda cannot, but Judith can.

 

"Judith is great talent for TV political panels and I have enjoyed working with her. Her sharp wit and put downs are the perfect mix for Breakfast TV shock jocks, but New Zealand doesn’t need a quick witted sarcastic entertainer as Prime Minister right now, "

What a load of b/s , from my perspective I  always thought Judith was far to polite to little wille on the show , I  actually started wondering if she was  tough enough she was so polite .

wille is running scared , panic is setting in , desperation when the next poll is released . winston is defiantly gone , he's attacking the party he put in power , that won't work and the right who voted for him last time will never forgive .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The next Election will really define NZ Voters. It will be interesting to see the outcome. By all accounts, if “1st past the post” was the norm, then Labour would not be in power - by a long margin. Assuming National are first past the post again (which I’m presuming they will be) then it will be up to the minorities. I’m picking most of the wasted NZ First Votes will revert back to the Nats, the ACT party votes will go to the Nats and they will do well. Labour is in trouble and only because NZ, in the end, will not cop free loaders and time wasters like Trevor Mallard - Who incidentally, many might regard will probably will go down as the worst performing Speaker in NZ’s history. Someone once suggested to me that the measure of a Speaker in control of House Proceedings is the least number of Members suspended from the House. The more ejected the less control and respect for the Speaker.  He may be unemployable after this election. Some may regard him a disgrace to the Parliament, his family and friends and more importantly, to NZ. No resemblance of impartiality and certainly no sense of responsibility with regard to allowing open debate. He’s May actually be helping the National cause so I guess he’s not helping a Labour at all! I don’t live in NZ so who’s in power will never affect me but jeez, you’d think Labour would have grabbed their chance when Peters took his pieces of silver and the “baubles of Office”. Sadly labour f...ed up their chance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Questions I would ask in determining this election outcome -

  • Will enough people who voted National last election (44.4%) change their vote to Labour (36.9%) this time for Labour to win? National won 12 more electoral seats than Labour last election, and after party votes held 10 more "total seats" after party votes (56 National vs 46 Labour). NZ First (many NZ First voters last election leaned National) won 9 total seats, so whichever party gets those votes this election should prove to be the winner. Does Labour think they are going to get those NZ First party votes & also steal some off National? Really? 
  • Will the cannabis referendum draw out enough Greens supporters to get them over the 5% threshold? Maybe/Maybe not.
  • Will any deals be done with Greens or NZ First in electorate seats, to possibly guarantee support and victory by either of the major parties? Labour say no, but to me that is the only way they can win.
  • Will the media offer anything even resembling a fair and balanced view of the campaigns, knowing if they appear to be against Labour or even fair during the campaign and Labour go on to win, they will be excommunicated in the next term?
  • Will factual economic and employment info of any consequence be released before the election day, or will there be some unforeseen delay? We cannot ignore that Tourism is in the  intensive care unit with no sign of the exit door at the moment.

The odds on a National win look attractive to me. Just one man's unbiased opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Littletramp said:

Questions I would ask in determining this election outcome -

  • Will enough people who voted National last election (44.4%) change their vote to Labour (36.9%) this time for Labour to win? National won 12 more electoral seats than Labour last election, and after party votes held 10 more "total seats" after party votes (56 National vs 46 Labour). NZ First (many NZ First voters last election leaned National) won 9 total seats, so whichever party gets those votes this election should prove to be the winner. Does Labour think they are going to get those NZ First party votes & also steal some off National? Really? 
  • Will the cannabis referendum draw out enough Greens supporters to get them over the 5% threshold? Maybe/Maybe not.
  • Will any deals be done with Greens or NZ First in electorate seats, to possibly guarantee support and victory by either of the major parties? Labour say no, but to me that is the only way they can win.
  • Will the media offer anything even resembling a fair and balanced view of the campaigns, knowing if they appear to be against Labour or even fair during the campaign and Labour go on to win, they will be excommunicated in the next term?
  • Will factual economic and employment info of any consequence be released before the election day, or will there be some unforeseen delay? We cannot ignore that Tourism is in the  intensive care unit with no sign of the exit door at the moment.

The odds on a National win look attractive to me. Just one man's unbiased opinion.

Well put Little Tramp and I  will add a couple of extras .

 A large portion of NZ F voters will go firstly to National and then ACT,  Act will do well this time , NZF voters who trusted peters will never forgive or forget .

Cannabis isn't just a green issue , young people in general might go for it BUT the stats came out yesterday , only 62% of young voters have enrolled (young voter?) so they might come out screaming and shouting but they aren't that keen to vote .

If it wasn't for covid the Nat's win would be a landslide , the polls pre covid showed them winning easily . Comrade cindy is using fear to win not policy or success , Robertson a couple of days ago , YOU wouldn't change government in the middle of a crisis .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, tripple alliance said:

Well put Little Tramp and I  will add a couple of extras .

 A large portion of NZ F voters will go firstly to National and then ACT,  Act will do well this time , NZF voters who trusted peters will never forgive or forget .

Cannabis isn't just a green issue , young people in general might go for it BUT the stats came out yesterday , only 62% of young voters have enrolled (young voter?) so they might come out screaming and shouting but they aren't that keen to vote .

If it wasn't for covid the Nat's win would be a landslide , the polls pre covid showed them winning easily . Comrade cindy is using fear to win not policy or success , Robertson a couple of days ago , YOU wouldn't change government in the middle of a crisis .

 

Nats should go for the youth vote , stoners might be crazy enough to vote blue, after all they now have one less sexual deviant going forward( although I think crusher has similar plans for nz people as filthy foto falloon had for that girl) Just bite down on the pillow if the nats get home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Nukkledragga said:

Nats should go for the youth vote , stoners might be crazy enough to vote blue, after all they now have one less sexual deviant going forward( although I think crusher has similar plans for nz people as filthy foto falloon had for that girl) Just bite down on the pillow if the nats get home.

Well sexual deviants is a traditionally left issue but this guy has been stupid enough to get snapped so good riddance to him , Judith is having a great cleanout , better now than later but is there an issue here

.Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM

" Dirty politics , now pay attention , last night I was talking to a labour party branch Mino , he was putting it around a certain fisherman had created a bump on his travels , the purpose of this was to  put it out there and hope the Nat's would run with it , the story was ridiculous to anyone who thought it through but this lot were trying to trap a Nat at the expense of our fisherman and his better half , now that's dirty politics ". 

Here we have a couple of  18 y old uni student's who are the recipients of texts , my question is was he baited in any way remembering the term TRAP A NAT and these people are clearly not Nat voters , it's worth a thought .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tripple alliance said:

Well sexual deviants is a traditionally left issue but this guy has been stupid enough to get snapped so good riddance to him , Judith is having a great cleanout , better now than later but is there an issue here

.Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM

" Dirty politics , now pay attention , last night I was talking to a labour party branch Mino , he was putting it around a certain fisherman had created a bump on his travels , the purpose of this was to  put it out there and hope the Nat's would run with it , the story was ridiculous to anyone who thought it through but this lot were trying to trap a Nat at the expense of our fisherman and his better half , now that's dirty politics ". 

Here we have a couple of  18 y old uni student's who are the recipients of texts , my question is was he baited in any way remembering the term TRAP A NAT and these people are clearly not Nat voters , it's worth a thought .

It is like the TARGET tv show and the porno videos and underwear layed out with lighting and camera angles paramount, I know a few tradies who didnt follow the script and rang the " owner"and a few who did , getting " maximum exposure" despite the scrambled pixels. Trap or not you have to take some responsibility  for your actions and that includes crusher, how many times are mental health issues going to be used to shut down the conversation.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, tripple alliance said:

Well sexual deviants is a traditionally left issue but this guy has been stupid enough to get snapped so good riddance to him , Judith is having a great cleanout , better now than later but is there an issue here

.Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM

" Dirty politics , now pay attention , last night I was talking to a labour party branch Mino , he was putting it around a certain fisherman had created a bump on his travels , the purpose of this was to  put it out there and hope the Nat's would run with it , the story was ridiculous to anyone who thought it through but this lot were trying to trap a Nat at the expense of our fisherman and his better half , now that's dirty politics ". 

Here we have a couple of  18 y old uni student's who are the recipients of texts , my question is was he baited in any way remembering the term TRAP A NAT and these people are clearly not Nat voters , it's worth a thought .

Interesting that the story was sent to Arderns office not Judith’s.......you get the feeling this will get messy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Nukkledragga said:

They are dropping like flies because they cant keep their flies zipped up ....never mind maybe under mmp they can get a top up of degenerates to maintain the balance.

Does having an affair make you a "degenerate"? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 100 1 said:

Which poll is fake?

The one the fake news wants you to believe or the online one that the people have voted on?

image.thumb.png.3f3531cbbbcd67e44dac4dba867c144c.png

 

JCpoll.png?w=696&ssl=1

 

image.png

The fact Chloe Swarbrick is anywhere near such a poll tells you all you need to know...🙄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all Dave, just applauding the Nats dirty politics and now understand why the Nats won't be in the Govt seats for at least another 9 years. Got to say not unhappy about that, in fact delighted and oddly enough I ain't a Labour votee but have to applaud their ethics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.