EsquireNZ 38 Report post Posted July 8, 2017 http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/07/police-to-investigate-board-member-over-todd-barclay-saga.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADM 225 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 So surely this is also a case for the RIU as well aquaman 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rumpole 483 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 23 minutes ago, ADM said: So surely this is also a case for the RIU as well What does the RIU have to do with Glenda and the national party? What Glenda did was not illegal? The RIU are useless. Glenda is on the board. She cant even discipline Godber Black Kirrama 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADM 225 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 Surely if found that she has perverted the course of justice the RIU has the ability to have her position with the board reviewed as not a fit person to be leading the industry? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohokaman 5,844 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 We have known that for a while ADM.....another job for the girls, just like that other waste of space Devoy. ADM 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midget 4,489 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 1 hour ago, ADM said: Surely if found that she has perverted the course of justice the RIU has the ability to have her position with the board reviewed as not a fit person to be leading the industry? Fuck no, quite the opposite, it's an essential part of the qualifying criteria for head office that you can hide in the shadow of a corkscrew, mind you with Glenda it'd be quite some corkscrew Chris Wood, Black Kirrama and ADM 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fartoomuch 1,376 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 16 hours ago, Midget said: Fuck no, quite the opposite, it's an essential part of the qualifying criteria for head office that you can hide in the shadow of a corkscrew, mind you with Glenda it'd be quite some corkscrew To add to your point it also stops intelligent people with the correct credentials working for or in governance roles at such a body when they see the nonsense that perpetually emanates from it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midget 4,489 Report post Posted July 9, 2017 Here's a solution. If a loser in a suit wants to work at head office they should have to prove they're competent by first riding a couple work, or at least tack a shoe on one. Conversely if a member of the real racing fraternity ( who put on the show ) want to transition to head office they need to prove they can eat three sausage rolls and drink a bottle of Pinot. It's all about credibility. Grego, aquaman, Memphis2 and 3 others 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...