RaceCafe..#1...Tipsters Thread.... Share Your Fancies For Fun...Lets See Who The Best Tipsters Here Are.
crustyngrizzly

Trump written off

Recommended Posts

heres something symbolically interesting...
in the scripture reference of proverbs 16:18

a strange coincidence occurred... which was pointed out to me..

it ties into.. Biden falling off his bike and the month that recognised as the pride month..

lo and behold... in the same month the Roe V Wade is flipped and brought down!!

coincidence? or Gods will to correct the abuses of Justice!!
watch what comes next!!
nothing can stop what is coming!!
"it had to be done this way"
100 1  *winks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 6xes said:

heres something symbolically interesting...
in the scripture reference of proverbs 16:18

a strange coincidence occurred... which was pointed out to me..

it ties into.. Biden falling off his bike and the month that recognised as the pride month..

lo and behold... in the same month the Roe V Wade is flipped and brought down!!

coincidence? or Gods will to correct the abuses of Justice!!
watch what comes next!!
nothing can stop what is coming!!
"it had to be done this way"
100 1  *winks

You're such a try-hard. That you've become a 100 1 disciple does you no favours. Although you were a religious fanatic jerk long before that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 100 1 said:

 

So Trump predicts 2 years ago exactly what happened with Roe v Wade yesterday and you call it toxic nonsense.

Think you need a reality check.

TDS at its finest

 

If you stack the Supreme Court with Conservative Evangelists what do you expect ? Taking the US back to the dark ages…..genius……🙈

And this will just be the start…..

After Roe v Wade's fall, a Supreme Court justice indicates that same-sex marriage and contraception could be next

Millions of Americans woke up on June 26 with fewer rights than they had the morning before. But one of the justices on the US Supreme Court has indicated abortion could be just the start.

 

0
 

27 June 2022 

When the US Supreme Court dramatically overturned the right of Americans to terminate a pregnancy, one justice was particularly fervent.

"The constitution does not confer a right to abortion," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion, echoing his colleagues' sentiments. 

It was a marked shift from his public statements on reproductive rights 30 years ago. 

During his confirmation hearing in 1991, then-judge Thomas was cagey about his position on Roe v Wade, the landmark ruling that protected Americans' right to abortion for nearly 50 years. 

"I can say on that issue… I have no agenda," he told the US Senate under oath.

Back then, he argued that as a judge, it would be inappropriate to take a case "in which he or she has such strong views that he or she cannot be impartial". 

And yet, once confirmed as a justice on the nation's highest court, he spent the next three decades openly expressing his deeply conservative beliefs, often through the power of the law.

On June 24, Justice Thomas and five of his colleagues chose to uphold a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks.

But four of those justices didn't just strike down one case. They shook Roe v Wade to its constitutional foundations. 

In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito labelled the 1973 decision "egregiously wrong" given the US constitution made no explicit mention of abortion. 

He argued, choosing his words carefully, that no other constitutional rights would be risked by the toppling of half a century of precedent. 

But Justice Thomas undercut him. 

One sentence that could change everything 

Buried on page 119 of the final opinion, Justice Thomas wrote the court "should reconsider" other past rulings that afford Americans certain rights. 

He referenced the key cases guaranteeing access to contraception, and legalising same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage. 

"In future cases, we should reconsider all of this court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," he wrote. 

In doing so, he all but confirmed the fears of millions of Americans that some conservatives won't be content with just scrapping abortion rights. 

They could target other hard-won rights next. 

Why this clause is so important 

In the United States, the right to have an abortion, to access birth control, and to have sex with or marry a person of the same gender all stem from one legal principle. 

"The 14th amendment to the US constitution says that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law," said Alexis Karteron, an associate professor of law and the director of the Constitutional Rights Clinic at Rutgers University. 

She added the due process clause of the amendment, which has existed for more than 150 years, has been read to address "very important issues to many, many Americans". 

"People have obviously come to rely on these rights," she said. 

But last week the court ruled the language of the clause should never apply to abortion access. 

"That's because, in part, the right to an abortion was not something that the people who wrote the 14th amendment would have thought about at the time it was passed in the mid-19th century," Ms Karteron said. 

It is not totally unprecedented for the court to reverse one of its decisions, she explained. 

But this was the first time, to her knowledge, a right the court had previously recognised was taken away. 

"We should not take any comfort in the fact that the majority opinion claims to only address abortion," she said. 

What could be next? 

Millions of Americans woke up on June 25 with fewer rights than they had the morning before. 

With the end of Roe v Wade, roughly half of US states banned or sharply narrowed access to abortion. 

The enormity of the health and economic implications of the Supreme Court's decision cannot be understated. 

But the ruling — and Justice Thomas's opinion in particular — has rattled many legal observers.

"Justice Thomas and his concurring opinion expressly said that the court should revisit a number of other due process cases that implicate deeply important issues like the right to same-sex marriage, the right to be in a same-sex relationship without facing criminalisation, the right to access birth control," Ms Karteron said. 

Up until 1965, local laws could stop people from accessing contraception. 

Then, in Griswold v Connecticut, the court quashed a law prohibiting contraceptive drugs and devices, in part because it determined citizens had a "right to privacy". 

Same-sex relationships remained criminalised in some states until 2003, when the court found Texas sodomy laws to be unconstitutional in Lawrence v Texas. 

And it was as recently as 2015 that Obergefell v Hodges saw same-sex marriage legalised nationwide, just a year before the election of former US president Donald Trump. 

Other justices who voted to dismantle Roe's protections insisted their ruling did not apply to these rights. 

Justice Samuel Alito said the question of abortion was unique because it involved the termination of a fetus. 

But legal experts aren't so sure it stops with Roe v Wade. 

"We absolutely should be concerned that in the future, the court will revisit those precedents, in part because Justice Thomas has told us that that is what he would like to see happen," Ms Karteron said. 

The question of interracial marriage

Critics of Justice Thomas were quick to point out there was one ruling he didn't mention in his opinion. 

And it's one that affects him personally. 

The 1967 ruling in the case of Loving v Virginia protects the right to interracial marriage. 

It was brought to the Supreme Court by Richard Loving, a white man, and Mildred Jeter, a black woman, who fell in love and married in the 1950s. 

They were handed a year in jail for violating Virginia's ban on interracial unions, though the sentence was suspended on the condition they leave the state for 25 years.

As a black man, Justice Thomas's own marriage to Ginni Thomas is recognised in the US because of the precedent set by Loving v Virginia. 

Jim Obergefell, the plaintiff behind the court's landmark ruling on same-sex marriage, told US media he found it "quite telling" Loving v Virginia was left out of Justice Thomas's opinion.

"That affects him personally, but he doesn't care about the LGBT community," Mr Obergefell told MSNBC. 

"I'm just concerned that hundreds of thousands of marriages across this nation are at risk, and the ability of people across this nation to marry the person they love is at risk." 

How quickly could America change? 

It's important to note that none of the other justices signed Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion. 

That suggests he doesn't have broad support within the court for his views. 

In fact, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who also voted to dismantle Roe, appeared to reject his colleague's position in his own opinion. 

But Democrats say that by overturning the ruling, the court has put other rights on the table — even, potentially, their own. 

The toppling of Roe v Wade may have felt impossible to many Americans just a few years ago. 

But in one term, then US-president Trump had the opportunity to install three justices, shifting the balance of the court to the right. 

His presidential successor, Joe Biden, said Justice Thomas had put America on an "extreme and dangerous path". 

"He explicitly called to reconsider the right of marriage equality, the right of couples to make their choices on contraception," President Biden said. 

Ms Karteron, who described Justice Thomas as "extremely conservative", said he has made his position clear. 

"He has really never been shy about saying exactly what he thinks," she said. 

"He's made clear for a very long time, that he thought that Roe was wrongly decided and needed to be reversed.

"And now obviously the same is true of these other precedents that he is calling on the court to reconsider and presumably reverse." 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ohokaman said:

If you stack the Supreme Court with Conservative Evangelists what do you expect ? Taking the US back to the dark ages…..genius……🙈

Hey genius ..Tell eveyone what happens all the aborted fetuses?

Are they sold?

Organ harvesting?

Who is benefitting?

You may want to rethink....oh thats right 50 years of fake news propaganda.... my body, my choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 100 1 said:

Hey genius ..Tell eveyone what happens all the aborted fetuses?

Are they sold?

Organ harvesting?

Who is benefitting?

You may want to rethink....oh thats right 50 years of fake news propaganda.... my body, my choice.

Why is this moron still here ?? Intelligent contribution to this site is NIL.

Pushing Conspiracies, lies, Twitter/ Q Anon crap and general bullshit….100%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ohokaman said:

Why is this moron still here ?? Intelligent contribution to this site is NIL.

Pushing Conspiracies, lies, Twitter/ Q Anon crap and general bullshit….100%

 

Hiding behind ignorance isn't going to save you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 100 1 said:

 

Try answering the questions

Difficult truths?

That's right it's all hidden from the sheep....hence why you have zero clue.


TRUE STORY!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its interesting that it has nearly been 50 years since the ROE V WADE case was decided....

50 years in scripture is a time where indebted slaves are set free and released from their debts!!
so in terms of the ROE V WADE over turning..this is very symbollic of being set free from a blood debt...

it is a well known scripture.. the shed blood of the innocent cries out to God

 

if we consider the 7 things god hates according to  Proverbs 6:16-19

the shedding of innocent blood is one of them!!  the other 6 have been on FULL display in the past 6 years... like never before!!
the worst part about it all... is some cannot see it!!
inexplicable!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More Russian disinformation

Hunters laptop won't go away

Turns out the Trump pee tape was fake but actual videos of Hunter but crickets by fake news

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jun/27/hunter-bidens-frolics-russia-linked-escorts-paid-j/

Report: Biden unwittingly paid for Hunter’s frolics with Russian-linked escorts

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kash Patel to declassify National Archives

Nothing can stop what is coming

 
 
Kash Patel announces he has just been designated by Trump as his official representative to the National Archives, “and I’m gonna march down there and identify every single document they’ve blocked from being declassified .. Russiagate is not over! It hasn’t even begun!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2022 at 1:31 PM, 6xes said:

if we consider the 7 things god hates according to  Proverbs 6:16-19

the shedding of innocent blood is one of them!!  the other 6 have been on FULL display in the past 6 years... like never before!!
the worst part about it all... is some cannot see it!!
inexplicable!!

 

I'm glad you raised Proverbs 6. 16-19 on the Trump thread 6xes, because there are three of these that clearly pertain to Donal Trump.

These being,  "a lying tongue"; "a false witness who pours out lies"; and, "a person who stirs up conflict in the community."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your response is typical of people... who recognise that all people are prone to having said something or done something that is sits within the scope of the Proverb verses...

which should make you ask... why did i bring it up!!

it was to highlight the Innocent blood being shed...   but you detract from that single most important point, which is not to say... Trump hasnt stirred up conflict in the community , or has never lied in his life... or anything else you wish to insinuate..

your response is merely to justify yourself!! and thats fine by me...

beyond that... was there a point to your comment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in an attempt to illuminate whats going on with President Trump.. and how we are coming into a season of harvest..

try to understand these scriptures& the tie-in to politics if you can!!

Matthew 10:36, Hebrews 4:12, matthew 13:24-30

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2022 at 12:17 PM, Uriah Heap said:

 

I'm glad you raised Proverbs 6. 16-19 on the Trump thread 6xes, because there are three of these that clearly pertain to Donal Trump.

These being,  "a lying tongue"; "a false witness who pours out lies"; and, "a person who stirs up conflict in the community."

Sounds like  the democrats not Trump , how many of these democrats could stand 5.5 years of investigation and not be charged with anything ?, and who lied for years about Russian collusion   that's right democrats and the media .TRUMP will return the only unfortunate obstacle might be the supreme court abortion ruling , that won't help the republicans .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, tripple alliance said:

Sounds like  the democrats not Trump , how many of these democrats could stand 5.5 years of investigation and not be charged with anything ?, and who lied for years about Russian collusion   that's right democrats and the media .TRUMP will return the only unfortunate obstacle might be the supreme court abortion ruling , that won't help the republicans .

Not if the American people have got any sense….if they haven’t worked out he is a lying, narcissist madman by now, they deserve all they get….

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ohokaman said:

Not if the American people have got any sense….if they haven’t worked out he is a lying, narcissist madman by now, they deserve all they get….

Again you are sounding like many democrats ,they are liars and scammers trying to protect their patch and are desperately still trying to discredit him with their one sided Jan 6 kangaroo court .

Face facts 5.5 years of persecution for ZERO charges . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ohokaman said:

Not if the American people have got any sense….if they haven’t worked out he is a lying, narcissist madman by now, they deserve all they get….

Ha what a joke.

Hows J6 going? are you the last person on the planet to believe the sham?

Get it straight Nov 3 2020 was the insurrection...  J6 is the cover up... False flag organised by the FBI, and the Democrats with their Antifa foot soldiers.

You actually think Casssidy Hutchinson is telling the truth?

Was a Team Trump plant?

How do you wake up the sheep?

Team Trump have caught them all.

 

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 000000 No.16552853 


Jun 29 2022 02:23:20 (EST)

What is at stake?
Who has control?
SURPRISE WITNESS.
Who was surprised?
Who will be surprised?
Use your logic.
Can emotions be used to influence decisions?
How do you control emotion?
Define 'Plant'.
How do you insert a plant?
Can emotions be used to insert a plant?
Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?
Trust the plan.
Q

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, tripple alliance said:

Again you are sounding like many democrats ,they are liars and scammers trying to protect their patch and are desperately still trying to discredit him with their one sided Jan 6 kangaroo court .

Face facts 5.5 years of persecution for ZERO charges . 

Bring Michael Avenatti back with those women who accused Brett Kavanaugh of atrocious crimes, and you have MORONS on here having a go at Trump.

Remember when he was going to be a Democrat President.

A few cafers here were creaming themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, tripple alliance said:

Again you are sounding like many democrats ,they are liars and scammers trying to protect their patch and are desperately still trying to discredit him with their one sided Jan 6 kangaroo court .

Face facts 5.5 years of persecution for ZERO charges . 

Another fucking idiot raises his head……🙈

I’ll be very surprised if they don’t nail him this time.

The evidence on many fronts is overwhelming……it will be up to the DOJ to make it happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, 100 1 said:

Ha what a joke.

Hows J6 going? are you the last person on the planet to believe the sham?

Get it straight Nov 3 2020 was the insurrection...  J6 is the cover up... False flag organised by the FBI, and the Democrats with their Antifa foot soldiers.

You actually think Casssidy Hutchinson is telling the truth?

Was a Team Trump plant?

How do you wake up the sheep?

Team Trump have caught them all.

 

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 000000 No.16552853 


Jun 29 2022 02:23:20 (EST)

What is at stake?
Who has control?
SURPRISE WITNESS.
Who was surprised?
Who will be surprised?
Use your logic.
Can emotions be used to influence decisions?
How do you control emotion?
Define 'Plant'.
How do you insert a plant?
Can emotions be used to insert a plant?
Who is Cassidy Hutchinson?
Trust the plan.
Q

Good old Q telling the truth again…..just like January 6. These morons will believe anything……🙈

Let’s see how many of the Cassidy deniers front up UNDER OATH at the hearing…….my guess is NONE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.