henery 35 Report post Posted December 12, 2014 Clear to the public eye a dog injured so badly to the point of euthanasia tonight at Wanganui yet no mention of even a one day stand down? AaronCrossGPLNZ 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaman 1,352 Report post Posted December 12, 2014 I'm afraid the stipe reports are now sanitised, and are not a true and correct record. AaronCrossGPLNZ 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
modest mouse 469 Report post Posted December 12, 2014 If you don't see a mention of it in the stipes report, you know it's very serious. God knows why they don't mention anything anymore. Everyone can see when dogs are in trouble. Sanitized alright. AaronCrossGPLNZ 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi 782 Report post Posted January 19, 2015 This one from yesterday has me scratching my head. https://www.thedogs.co.nz/catch-the-action/11537/stewards-report.aspx "MANYANA GROPER weighed in 1.6 kilograms up in weight from his last start on 15.12.15 and this was an intentional increase." yet in the Judicial Report there's no mention of a fine. When is a rule a rule & when isn't it? Although it's not noted, I sure hope it wasn't because of the "paper work" trainer change, because that excuse an absolute farce in my opinion. The following link is for the official wandering eyes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrity Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GONSTA 1,148 Report post Posted January 19, 2015 This one from yesterday has me scratching my head. https://www.thedogs.co.nz/catch-the-action/11537/stewards-report.aspx "MANYANA GROPER weighed in 1.6 kilograms up in weight from his last start on 15.12.15 and this was an intentional increase." yet in the Judicial Report there's no mention of a fine. When is a rule a rule & when isn't it? Although it's not noted, I sure hope it wasn't because of the "paper work" trainer change, because that excuse an absolute farce in my opinion. The following link is for the official wandering eyes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrity Only a fine if last start less than a month prior I believe. Yankiwi 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi 782 Report post Posted January 20, 2015 Only a fine if last start less than a month prior I believe. Thanks for that ReillyM. 28 days to be exact. I was thinking it was 3 months, my error. 69.11 Where the weight of a Greyhound recorded at a Meeting varies by more than one and a half (1.5) kilograms from the weight recorded in a Race in which it last performed that Greyhound shall be permitted to compete in the current Race but the Trainer of the Greyhound shall be guilty of an Offence unless permission has been granted under Rule 69.12. 69.12 Where a Greyhound is presented for a Race and such Greyhound is competing for a Trainer other than the Trainer at its last start the Stewards shall waive any Penalty that would otherwise be imposed for any weight variance. Permission shall be granted by Stewards for a Greyhound recording a weight variance of more than one and a half (1.5) kilograms to start in a Race provided that such Greyhound has not performed in any Race during the preceding 28 days, and no fine shall be imposed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ate 20 Report post Posted January 20, 2015 This one from yesterday has me scratching my head. https://www.thedogs.co.nz/catch-the-action/11537/stewards-report.aspx "MANYANA GROPER weighed in 1.6 kilograms up in weight from his last start on 15.12.15 and this was an intentional increase." yet in the Judicial Report there's no mention of a fine. When is a rule a rule & when isn't it? Although it's not noted, I sure hope it wasn't because of the "paper work" trainer change, because that excuse an absolute farce in my opinion. The following link is for the official wandering eyes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrity You wouldnt get a job with iru . You cant read and you cant count. it's a ballroom 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi 782 Report post Posted January 20, 2015 You wouldnt get a job with iru . Nor do I want one, if it's the RIU you're referring to. I could however become a rule abiding trainer. happy, brainstorm, windingmeup and 1 other 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy 62 Report post Posted January 20, 2015 also as long as you say yes it was suppose to be you also get off!! as if you would say oh shit that wasn't supposed to weigh that windingmeup 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brainstorm 47 Report post Posted January 20, 2015 Ate ..maybe you would get a job with the R.I.U. Insider information is priceless.. windingmeup 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...