Uriah Heap 481 Report post Posted February 17, 2013 His case is to be reviewed by the Privy Counsel in the UK. I am not saying he is innocent but, taking a line through the Bain case, then they would have to rule that a retrial is the order of the day. Some of the evidence used to convict Lundy is far more dubious than anything used to convict David Bain. I refer to minute spots of blood on clothing, the victims stomach contents, altering the computer time, getting from Lower Hutt to Palmerston North and back in 3 hours in peak hour traffic, and the testimony of the women who claimed to have seen Lundy near his house that night. She is well known as a nut job. Using the Bain case as a guide, the Privy Counsel must rule a retrial to be the order of the day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
