TAB AI Form comments

[Pak Star 1,224]

On 12/1/2024 at 3:19 PM, Palliser said:

Exactly .. why don't they just use the PDF comments ?? .. what's the point of the B.S they put up ? .. and please Pakaraka dont tell me where and how to view the PDF because I know. 

The point as everyone else on this post has said do it once up front and do it right.

Not sure why I am singled out.  I was the one who showed you where they were.  My point was only ever in response to you saying they no longer existed and then whinged about it over multiple threads and multiple months like you had lost your puppy, despite me apparently wasting my time pointing out where they were many times.  Then one day you finally decided to listen and miraculously found them... but the whinging continued anyway.

I would tend to agree that they should use the PDF form in the main part of the field but for whatever reason they don't, I assume because of a licensing deal with racingandsports who I believe is the source of the info.  I don't know.  And I don't really care.  I am well on the record stating if you want to be a half decent punter you are best to avoid any external comments, tips, commentator analysis, trackside host analysis etc.  All noise to deviate from your confidence in your own selections, and ultimately used to generate revenue.  If you really cared about the newcomer reading comments and being influenced, you would advocate for their complete removal.

Anyway if the PDF comments are important to you, click the two links.  Simple.  Or continue to post about how you don't want to click two links.  Less simple.  

 

[Palliser 1,276]

On 12/3/2024 at 6:51 PM, Pak Star said:

Not sure why I am singled out.  I was the one who showed you where they were.  My point was only ever in response to you saying they no longer existed and then whinged about it over multiple threads and multiple months like you had lost your puppy, despite me apparently wasting my time pointing out where they were many times.  Then one day you finally decided to listen and miraculously found them... but the whinging continued anyway.

I would tend to agree that they should use the PDF form in the main part of the field but for whatever reason they don't, I assume because of a licensing deal with racingandsports who I believe is the source of the info.  I don't know.  And I don't really care.  I am well on the record stating if you want to be a half decent punter you are best to avoid any external comments, tips, commentator analysis, trackside host analysis etc.  All noise to deviate from your confidence in your own selections, and ultimately used to generate revenue.  If you really cared about the newcomer reading comments and being influenced, you would advocate for their complete removal.

Anyway if the PDF comments are important to you, click the two links.  Simple.  Or continue to post about how you don't want to click two links.  Less simple.  

 

Probably because everytime I raised the subject, you relentlessly told me how to use the PDF format which I explained relentlessly I wasn't interested in going backwards and forwards with, and it wasn't the subject matter

[Arkham 54]

Comments like this are just plain ignorant.  Even more so when the horse concerned runs nearly 20 lengths tailed off last. 

 

ZANTABULOUS (2) has been thereabouts, finishing seventh at Te Rapa last time and 1.5 lengths from the winner. This is the easiest field here she has met this time in and has a winning rider atop here. Should be winning this for sure.

[Pak Star 1,224]

10 hours ago, Palliser said:

Probably because everytime I raised the subject, you relentlessly told me how to use the PDF format which I explained relentlessly I wasn't interested in going backwards and forwards with, and it wasn't the subject matter

Again, not true.  Your whinging was always about the form comments being non-existent. 

I told you where to find them on June 20, once again on July 6, and once on August 21st.  Finally on August 31st you decided to give in and on the "TAB Website..." thread you commented "I checked out what you pointed out Pak..." as if it was the first time you looked and they were a revelation to you.  And that there was my point above...  Too busy going back and forwards in here using the forum as a tissue for your issue, but not willing to go back and forwards on the app.  Complete hypocrisy.

As I said on the whale thread... I'm here for the accountability. 

[Palliser 1,276]

2 hours ago, Pak Star said:

Again, not true.  Your whinging was always about the form comments being non-existent. 

I told you where to find them on June 20, once again on July 6, and once on August 21st.  Finally on August 31st you decided to give in and on the "TAB Website..." thread you commented "I checked out what you pointed out Pak..." as if it was the first time you looked and they were a revelation to you.  And that there was my point above...  Too busy going back and forwards in here using the forum as a tissue for your issue, but not willing to go back and forwards on the app.  Complete hypocrisy.

As I said on the whale thread... I'm here for the accountability. 

OMG .. you're relentless. Last word from me is I am not accountable to you.

But you win, I give up

[Palliser 1,276]

I know these comments are absolutely littered with rubbish wherever you look. Check out comments for Last Souvenir race 4 at Trentham. To a relatively new punter, initially you would think sounds good .. hang on now it doesn't .. then finally now I'm confused.

Thats the whole issue, TAB and Entain are making it like the pokie machines for the uninitiated, a poke in the dark. When you are happy to take peoples money, then you shouldn't provide BS information.

[Palliser 1,276]

Just now, Palliser said:

I know these comments are absolutely littered with rubbish wherever you look. Check out comments for Last Souvenir race 4 at Trentham. To a relatively new punter, initially you would think sounds good .. hang on now it doesn't .. then finally now I'm confused.

Thats the whole issue, TAB and Entain are making it like the pokie machines for the uninitiated, a poke in the dark. When you are happy to take peoples money, then you shouldn't provide BS information.

Oh another one, Race 1 My Ferrari in a 4 horse field is being touted as possibly running 4th at best

 

[Pak Star 1,224]

22 minutes ago, Palliser said:

Oh another one, Race 1 My Ferrari in a 4 horse field is being touted as possibly running 4th at best

 

Ever considered that perhaps it was written before the scratchings made it a 4 horse field?

Your whinging about everything to do with the industry is insane.  I see your negativity is even getting called out on the greyhound thread now.  A new low.  

Perhaps the racing game is not for you, and a new hobby might be best since you hate this one so much?  Save you from having to start multiple threads and posts crying about all thats bad about the industry, and save us all having to trawl through the negativity. 

[Mr Horse 40]

Great comment on the first race winner at Wellington. I had a look at the trial after reading the comment "nice quiet trial. Dont treat lightly". I always read the PDF and make up my own mind.

[Palliser 1,276]

2 hours ago, Pak Star said:

Ever considered that perhaps it was written before the scratchings made it a 4 horse field?

Your whinging about everything to do with the industry is insane.  I see your negativity is even getting called out on the greyhound thread now.  A new low.  

Perhaps the racing game is not for you, and a new hobby might be best since you hate this one so much?  Save you from having to start multiple threads and posts crying about all thats bad about the industry, and save us all having to trawl through the negativity. 

Not true .. I had $100 at $1.50 you would fall for the 4 horse field thing

[Pak Star 1,224]

1 minute ago, Palliser said:

Not true .. I had $100 at $1.50 you would fall for the 4 horse field thing

Don't try to save face.  You had another idiotic moan and accountability pulled through once again.

[Palliser 1,276]

2 hours ago, Pak Star said:

Ever considered that perhaps it was written before the scratchings made it a 4 horse field?

Your whinging about everything to do with the industry is insane.  I see your negativity is even getting called out on the greyhound thread now.  A new low.  

Perhaps the racing game is not for you, and a new hobby might be best since you hate this one so much?  Save you from having to start multiple threads and posts crying about all thats bad about the industry, and save us all having to trawl through the negativity. 

And no comeback on the Last Souvenir b.s comment ? .. I suspect with your relentless defence of a crap service to the customer, you may be part of it  

[Pak Star 1,224]

Just now, Palliser said:

And no comeback on the Last Souvenir b.s comment ? .. I suspect with your relentless defence of a crap service to the customer, you may be part of it  

Once again, I dont read them, and I dont care.  Only replied on the 4 horse field one because you told us what it said, as you like to do 14 times a week.  Just find a new hobby already.  Your posts are getting flamed on thoroughbred, harness and greyhounds forums now.  

[Palliser 1,276]

1 minute ago, Pak Star said:

Once again, I dont read them, and I dont care.  Only replied on the 4 horse field one because you told us what it said, as you like to do 14 times a week.  Just find a new hobby already.  Your posts are getting flamed on thoroughbred, harness and greyhounds forums now.  

So you're a selective reader as well as a relentless individual. If you are objective then you would have read Last Souvenirs comment for sure. If you're happy for the TAB and Entain deceiving people then good for you.

Flamed wow, I didn't realise I was red hot. Thanks for the compliment

[Mr Horse 40]

3 hours ago, Palliser said:

I know these comments are absolutely littered with rubbish wherever you look. Check out comments for Last Souvenir race 4 at Trentham. To a relatively new punter, initially you would think sounds good .. hang on now it doesn't .. then finally now I'm confused.

Thats the whole issue, TAB and Entain are making it like the pokie machines for the uninitiated, a poke in the dark. When you are happy to take peoples money, then you shouldn't provide BS information.

So where did the Punters get there money taken off them? Maybe you should review your races a bit better. Even the trainer talked up to his chances but the way you carried on it had no chance.

[Maximus 818]

Osteria at Trentham today. According to them is a 3yo bay gelding (and indeed it is), but ...
Looks a mare with good upside.

[Palliser 1,276]

54 minutes ago, Mr Horse said:

So where did the Punters get there money taken off them? Maybe you should review your races a bit better. Even the trainer talked up to his chances but the way you carried on it had no chance.

Your completely missing the point, the comments suggested NO. And it's only one example of hugely inaccurate information supplied for the punter all over this site. Experts like yourself probably knew it is a handy horse, as do I after reading trackwork, and watching a couple of the horses races.

I will explain AGAIN I am not speaking from my pocket. I speaking on behalf of the less initiated pockets.

[Mr Horse 40]

21 minutes ago, Palliser said:

Your completely missing the point, the comments suggested NO. And it's only one example of hugely inaccurate information supplied for the punter all over this site. Experts like yourself probably knew it is a handy horse, as do I after reading trackwork, and watching a couple of the horses races.

I will explain AGAIN I am not speaking from my pocket. I speaking on behalf of the less initiated pockets.

First of all Im no expert just a casual punter who likes the odd bet. Your missing my point. You said it suggested NO it couldn't be in it? Too the less initiated punter where does it say that? Nice run on debut. Up in distance. Well it ran home well for second when you read the form of its run. So you can clearly see why I'm confused where the less initiated were given hugely inaccurate information to quote you?!?!?!

Lets face it you made a lemon of a comment so now own it!

[Pak Star 1,224]

20 minutes ago, Palliser said:

I will explain AGAIN I am not speaking from my pocket. I speaking on behalf of the less initiated pockets.

Don't try the noble white knight argument again.  We don't buy it.  Nobody would relentlessly spam a forum with dozens of posts for the sake of another.  YOU have an issue with them because YOU read them all day every day.  Punting with success is only possible by having an edge on those "less initiated".  No different to poker in that respect.  You put your money in.  Someone else puts their money in.  Someones pockets leave a bit heavier.  Someones pockets leave a bit lighter.  And in the meantime the house takes a rake.  

[Pak Star 1,224]

3 minutes ago, Mr Horse said:

Lets face it you made a lemon of a comment so now own it!

Good luck.  Hes not a big fan of others holding him accountable. 

Best to just leave him to his angry rants.  

[Palliser 1,276]

16 minutes ago, Mr Horse said:

First of all Im no expert just a casual punter who likes the odd bet. Your missing my point. You said it suggested NO it couldn't be in it? Too the less initiated punter where does it say that? Nice run on debut. Up in distance. Well it ran home well for second when you read the form of its run. So you can clearly see why I'm confused where the less initiated were given hugely inaccurate information to quote you?!?!?!

Lets face it you made a lemon of a comment so now own it!

Are you unable to read ? .. where did I suggest it couldn't be in it ??? I was quoting the form comments that said firstly, definite improver here, secondly, to many here are superior, and thirdly has upside. That's where an uninitiated person would think firstly yes, then no, then I'm confused.

Go back and read those comments on TAB website and tell me I'm seeing things.

Then maybe you are big enough to admit you're wrong.

[Palliser 1,276]

21 minutes ago, Pak Star said:

Don't try the noble white knight argument again.  We don't buy it.  Nobody would relentlessly spam a forum with dozens of posts for the sake of another.  YOU have an issue with them because YOU read them all day every day.  Punting with success is only possible by having an edge on those "less initiated".  No different to poker in that respect.  You put your money in.  Someone else puts their money in.  Someones pockets leave a bit heavier.  Someones pockets leave a bit lighter.  And in the meantime the house takes a rake.  

I give up, you're relentless attacking and defence of a crap website is too good for me.

[Palliser 1,276]

17 minutes ago, Pak Star said:

Good luck.  Hes not a big fan of others holding him accountable. 

Best to just leave him to his angry rants.  

Again as per my answer to Horse, tell me where I said NO the horse can't win, and read the silly form comments and tell me I'm seeing things

[Pak Star 1,224]

29 minutes ago, Palliser said:

I give up, you're relentless attacking and defence of a crap website is too good for me.

Where have I defended the website?  I don't promote nor defend it.

My point has always been about you, and your constant whinging and moaning throughout the entire forum.  Worse than my kids going on and on.  Doing peoples heads in and they're starting to call your BS out.     

If you're going to give up on something, just give up the whinging.

[Palliser 1,276]

28 minutes ago, Pak Star said:

Where have I defended the website?  I don't promote nor defend it.

My point has always been about you, and your constant whinging and moaning throughout the entire forum.  Worse than my kids going on and on.  Doing peoples heads in and they're starting to call your BS out.     

If you're going to give up on something, just give up the whinging.

I find saying my constant this and that extremely rich coming from you lols. Please tell me who else apart from your fine self is calling me out for stating facts ??

I notice as with Horse neither of you has proven me wrong as I have asked above. You can't prove me wrong. So instead just attack me.