100 1

New Conservatives They tweeted the above New [email protected] · Dec 5, 2019 Don't believe the Doomers. Imagine the legacy of baseless fear they will be remembered for. NC will pull NZ out of the Paris Climate Accord, rescind the Carbon Zero bill and scrap the ETS.#LetsFixThis #nzpolhttps://www.newconservative.org.nz/environment-policy …

At least there's one NZ political party that is sane and not controlled by the deep state.

The point is the rider took corrective action and as a result lost momentum hence the small winning margin How can you say he would have beaten the other horse with no interference, It would have been beaten by far more. They are obviously saying because the margin was a head, without the interference it would have won. No, without the interference it would have lost by a length https://loveracing.nz/Common/SystemTemplates/Modal/Video.aspx?v=https%3a%2f%2fwww.youtube.com%2fembed%2faEy83L6XK1s&i=%2fCommon%2fImage.ashx%3fw%3d565%26h%3d314%26a%3d1%26o%3d1%26z%3d1%26bg%3deeeeee%26p%3dhttp%3a%2f%2fimg.youtube.com%2fvi%2faEy83L6XK1s%2f0.jpg&r=Stewards' Vision Race 2 - EXECUTIVE TRAVEL 1100&rs=1

They don't hate Trump They hate being exposed by Trump This is who have been running this planet....when the people find out a new and better world will evolve.

The impeachment trial is to educate the people. It will all boomerang back on the Dems...AND EVERYBODY WILL BE WATCHING This will explain

Bringing the Clinton Foundation into play before next week.

Free speech the WINNER

So the corrupt tech sites have shutting down Q and the truth sites They are in deep shit The word "knowingly" will determine the fate of many deep state players in the upcoming trials. Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 No.26 Dec 2 2019 15:29:13 (EST) DKhq1x.JPG http://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1201338878046752771 Why are the largest media co's in the world constantly attacking this so-called 'conspiracy'? http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=qanon&qft=interval%3d%229%22&form=PTFTNR People awake = greatest fear. Information Warfare. Q 18 U.S. Code § 2385 Anonymous No.20 Dec 2 2019 12:50:31 (EST) DzxUUNUWwAAqoyy.jpg 18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government. Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

So Ohokaman's other pick Kamala Harris has just pulled out of the race. He is now left with Creepy Corrupt Quid Pro Joe and Fake Pocahontas Wow what a team Harris and Booker were behind the Smollet hoax. How come Harris was polling 8 points above Trump H2H....these are the fake polls the Ohoka believes.

Tim I think they need a bunker system like the league that does all races. No jockey trainer input. They make a decision and explain the rule.

Today Paris Accord It's one giant con Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 No.88 Dec 3 2019 13:43:47 (EST) ParisEF.PNG http://www.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-accord-pelosi/us-house-speaker-pelosi-says-at-climate-summit-we-are-still-in-idUSKBN1Y61SZ Who audits where the money actually goes? What % is typically categorized as costs? http://worldat1c.org/how-much-will-the-paris-agreement-cost-85f78d9a035a How to 'steal' taxpayer money? The 'Con': >Determine 'topic(s)' that have emotional pull (connect) on 'vocal' types >Create media blitz [scare] campaign ('talking points')('alarmist') >Use 'pro-narrative minded' authorities on subject to provide foundation to support >Deploy 'circular reporting' and 'group-think' tactics (echo chamber) to artificially raise 'public outcry' >Use 'public outcry' to justify billion dollar taxpayer spend >Rinse/repeat Who audits where the money goes? % to original mandate? Salary of a US Senator? Salary of a US Congressman/woman? Salary of a US President? Salary of a US Vice President? Net worth pre_office? Net worth post_office? How do elected officials become mega/multi-millionaires? Corruption. Logical thinking. Q

You're one big joke Remember here's your presidential pick Creepy sleepy quid pro Joe Enjoy the show

Can't help thinking the China /HK situation has been organised between Trump and Xi All part of the plan to wake up the people....part of the trade agreement. Guessing it will all be resolved sometime after the SHTF next week.

Follow the money!

I think this maybe the rule The new rule will mean connections of a horse protesting a race result will have to convince a judicial committee that their horse would have finished ahead of the horse who caused the interference. Her's the problem as I see it. The interference actually benefited the 2nd horse thus reducing the winning margin to a head as the winning horse lost momentum to avoid contact.. e.g So if the 2 horses swapped lanes and the 2nd horse had a straight run to the line and the winner, although shying was able to continue being ridden with momentum it is almost certain to have won by a far greater margin. Hence the JCA decision ......would have finished ahead of the horse who caused the interference ....is not valid IMO