SingaporeSling

Members
  • Content Count

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About SingaporeSling

  • Rank
    Maiden - R50

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

195 profile views
  1. Thank you Ponderosa, Mrs Cubes, and Scooby ... really appreciated. R1 6,10,11,15 R2 4,6,7,10 R3 4,5,7,8 R4 2,4,6,8 R5 5,12,14,16 R6 2,7,11,13 R7 1,6,9,13 R8 1,3,7,8 R9 4,7,11,14 cheers, Stephen
  2. Thank you to Ponderosa, our sponsors, and all those involved. Good luck. Rosehill R4: 1,6 R5: 2,10 R6: 10,13 R7: 6,16 R8: 11,12 Flemington R4: 8,11 R5: 3,12 R6: 3,7 R7: 2,12 R8: 11,17
  3. Yep, well done to all for running this - certainly keeps the interest up. R1 6,9,18 R2 1,5,13 R3 2,5,8 R4 3,6,12 R5 4,5,6 R6 7,9,11 R7 9,11,14 R8 1,5,14 R9 1,4,11
  4. Yep, a great big thanks to all for running this in these strange times... R1 3,4,5 R2 4,7,9 R3 1,2,10 R4 3,4,5 R5 4,10,12 R6 2,3,7 R7 4,5,9 R8 4,10,12 R9 2,9,14 R10 1,6,9
  5. If you mean the Bonus Bets from Race 1 and 2, then they hang around for two weeks... it shows the expiry date.
  6. Under the Racing, click on Prov Results and bring up the "old" results page, easy to find the meeting and scroll... the new results are not user friendly and as you say, missing info as well at times.
  7. I agree, always seems tough to win at Trentham... has been that way ever since I first started punting. Had my biggest ever bet at Trentham, and lost, on Krona... but when you think about how the tote works, for every loser (or losers) there must be a winner (or winners) so some folks out there have cracked the Trentham curse and must view it as a Gold Mine. Can't say I have ever met any of them yet though!
  8. Given many of the current drivers are from extended, and related racing families, there is no doubt the family BBQ, or get together must involve talk on the next days races amongst drivers and trainers, but that would hardly be construed as fixing? Which is why the police Case will need to be rock solid, re fixing.... i.e. will need clear evidence (assume they have calls, txt, msgss), and have "intent" to fix, and probably need to show someone close to them, i.e. family or friend benefited from the action. Will be interesting to see how it all pans out... a real shame for the industry no matter what the outcome from here on in.
  9. If it keeps going, one wonders if there will be a Friday Addington meeting at all this week, might not be too many trainers or drivers left to attend!!!
  10. See the upcoming Addington meeting has had a number of driver changes, so suspect that may have happened.
  11. Yep, the courses that hold mixed code meetings is the one that also has me scratching my head... does state this in the report about this, so need to see the outcome from the July meetings.: We understand that this plan for venue closures of thoroughbred racecourses will cause no conflicts or other issues for the harness or greyhound racing codes that cannot reasonably be resolved. There are 9 thoroughbred racecourses that we are recommending for closure that we believe the Harness Code might wish to retain. Of these, 1 is owned freehold by a thoroughbred Race Club, 4 are jointly owned, 3 are Racecourse Reserves and 1 is a lease. We understand that both Codes have met during July to discuss this matter and that positive discussions were held.
  12. Yep, Good Luck All... and thank you, as always to a true legend of Racecafe, Bruce! Many things have changed on here over the last 10 years or so, but thankfully, you have remained an integral part of the site... Sydney R6 #1 Rebel Dane cheers, Singapore Sling
  13. M3 R6 #2 Lucia Valentina As always, thank you Bruce... cheers