tonymac

RIU have already stated it was food based however it apparently stated on the packet that the contents contained green tea extract so don't like his chances

well Scooby you sound like the school prefect in his first year .Ashoka offered an opinion nothing more, certainly note actionable in any court of law why would you need to prove it?

how about these initial's only each can be proven if you really want. RM,LW,TD,MH,JP,RH,EF,PM,RL.

surely its obvious,if, it's not reported in the stipes report then no figures are kept.If no figures are kept then it didn't happen.then if any embarrassing questions are asked at a later date why we have no figures for that.

and whatsmore when you've got Ashoka on your side you know you really are swimming against the current

the way its always been done is called a precedent .Thinking everyone is wrong except me is called lunacy

me tinks you may be wearing the emperors new clothes lad and just can't admit your wrong

interesting theory however for the last 40 years its been read as turning the head and coming in contact with.be an interesting rule book if we are going to try and define what the greyhounds thinking.

he looked like he broke down at sale December had the 1 box led out then went back through the field.has tailed off every run since.Has had a month off since then and did win a trial with low grade dogs over 375 but would like to see him run a race before I would back him.

lol how can you tell? never made it past the first bend

Even then you wouldn't pick it unless you read every single race report.I would suggest it should be on the RIU site.

i would suggest you watch the race in slowmo the dog never turned its head looks like its running away from an injury

try joe tapiki at foxton

had a dog won it 1994 was a c4 505 @ the mighty manawatu

www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-07/blooding-greyhouns/5076970