RaceCafe..#1...Tipsters Thread.... Share Your Fancies For Fun...Lets See Who The Best Tipsters Here Are.

poundforpound

Members
  • Posts

    434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    203

Reputation Activity

  1. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from Archer in Losers Get Laid results thread   
    I’m very disappointed to see me go, as you clearly all are….however might I say, as I leave the stage, that this is a fun comp…..I clearly don’t have the required skill set to pick losers ad-infinitum….….but I’ve done my best to be a loser, like Chris Thomson…..and I’m looking forward to the next iteration of this LGL …bring on.the spring 
  2. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from Insider in Losers Get Laid - Week 5 entry thread - Sat 30 July   
    Having a threesome is fine…….as long as your wife’s involved 
  3. Sad
    poundforpound got a reaction from Keneperu in Why do they do trackwork at such ungodly hours?   
    Unlike you I’m not a six fingered ankle deep mud lover from the Naki …. Give up while you’re behind “banjo boy” 
  4. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from JJ Flash in Why do they do trackwork at such ungodly hours?   
    Why do you give this Mulebacker oxygen ?
    His questions are so bizarre they don’t warrant a response do they ?
  5. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Tauhei Notts in Rotorua   
    Is the RIB blaming Wiremu Pinn ?
    He’s normally their “fall guy” isn’t he ? 
  6. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from LongOwner in Rotorua   
    Is the RIB blaming Wiremu Pinn ?
    He’s normally their “fall guy” isn’t he ? 
  7. Sad
    poundforpound got a reaction from Just Looking in Rotorua   
    Is the RIB blaming Wiremu Pinn ?
    He’s normally their “fall guy” isn’t he ? 
  8. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from d.burrow - Joan in Losers Get Laid - Week 4 entry thread - Sat 23 July   
    I’m all in at Caulfield 
    Race 4 #3 Forest Diamond
    R5 #3 No Effort 
    I note D. Burrow ( be it a he, she or a they ) has made the same lay.. that’s a concern 
    Thank you all for putting the comp on, and thank you losers for doing your best imitation of Chris Thomson & Bevan Sweeney  
  9. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from scooby3051 in Losers Get Laid - Week 4 entry thread - Sat 23 July   
    I’m all in at Caulfield 
    Race 4 #3 Forest Diamond
    R5 #3 No Effort 
    I note D. Burrow ( be it a he, she or a they ) has made the same lay.. that’s a concern 
    Thank you all for putting the comp on, and thank you losers for doing your best imitation of Chris Thomson & Bevan Sweeney  
  10. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from Basil brush in Losers Get Laid - Week 4 entry thread - Sat 23 July   
    I’m all in at Caulfield 
    Race 4 #3 Forest Diamond
    R5 #3 No Effort 
    I note D. Burrow ( be it a he, she or a they ) has made the same lay.. that’s a concern 
    Thank you all for putting the comp on, and thank you losers for doing your best imitation of Chris Thomson & Bevan Sweeney  
  11. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from LongOwner in RIU Justice   
    Can you not see that the RIB. is corrupted 
    You need only look at the Inca case…or look at the greatest driver NZ has ever produced, who is currently a superstar in North America, or look at the RIB treatment of me, because I flight for justice and fairness …or look at the way they treat Wiremu Pinn…….they are so corrupted they can no longer see that they’re corrupt, they think they’re normal !! 
    They are like a metastisising cancer that’s destroying racing from the inside out ….at a cost of 14 million a year 
  12. Thanks
    poundforpound got a reaction from LongOwner in RIU Justice   
    This problem is so easily fixed 
    You change the rules to “quantitative” results rather than “qualitative” …..then you have a threshold level at which the drug is deemed to be performance enhancing 
    I did a case for Kenny Rae a couple of years ago, in front of Professor Geoff Hall ( a good bloke with a great brain on him )
    Anyway I used international laboratories for the B sample and proved the “P” levels in the positive swab were at 5 by 10 to the minus nine ( nanograms )

    I then produced protocols that proved the human threshold for a brain surgeon or airline pilot was 300 nanograms……60 times higher …….yep, 60 times higher and you were fit to work 
    I’ve simplified some details here but you get my drift and if you’re interested the case is on the JCA site 
     
  13. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Tauhei Notts in RIU Justice   
    This problem is so easily fixed 
    You change the rules to “quantitative” results rather than “qualitative” …..then you have a threshold level at which the drug is deemed to be performance enhancing 
    I did a case for Kenny Rae a couple of years ago, in front of Professor Geoff Hall ( a good bloke with a great brain on him )
    Anyway I used international laboratories for the B sample and proved the “P” levels in the positive swab were at 5 by 10 to the minus nine ( nanograms )

    I then produced protocols that proved the human threshold for a brain surgeon or airline pilot was 300 nanograms……60 times higher …….yep, 60 times higher and you were fit to work 
    I’ve simplified some details here but you get my drift and if you’re interested the case is on the JCA site 
     
  14. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Pam Robson in RIU Justice   
    This problem is so easily fixed 
    You change the rules to “quantitative” results rather than “qualitative” …..then you have a threshold level at which the drug is deemed to be performance enhancing 
    I did a case for Kenny Rae a couple of years ago, in front of Professor Geoff Hall ( a good bloke with a great brain on him )
    Anyway I used international laboratories for the B sample and proved the “P” levels in the positive swab were at 5 by 10 to the minus nine ( nanograms )

    I then produced protocols that proved the human threshold for a brain surgeon or airline pilot was 300 nanograms……60 times higher …….yep, 60 times higher and you were fit to work 
    I’ve simplified some details here but you get my drift and if you’re interested the case is on the JCA site 
     
  15. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Leggy in RIU Justice   
    This problem is so easily fixed 
    You change the rules to “quantitative” results rather than “qualitative” …..then you have a threshold level at which the drug is deemed to be performance enhancing 
    I did a case for Kenny Rae a couple of years ago, in front of Professor Geoff Hall ( a good bloke with a great brain on him )
    Anyway I used international laboratories for the B sample and proved the “P” levels in the positive swab were at 5 by 10 to the minus nine ( nanograms )

    I then produced protocols that proved the human threshold for a brain surgeon or airline pilot was 300 nanograms……60 times higher …….yep, 60 times higher and you were fit to work 
    I’ve simplified some details here but you get my drift and if you’re interested the case is on the JCA site 
     
  16. Thanks
    poundforpound got a reaction from Patiti in RIU Justice   
    This problem is so easily fixed 
    You change the rules to “quantitative” results rather than “qualitative” …..then you have a threshold level at which the drug is deemed to be performance enhancing 
    I did a case for Kenny Rae a couple of years ago, in front of Professor Geoff Hall ( a good bloke with a great brain on him )
    Anyway I used international laboratories for the B sample and proved the “P” levels in the positive swab were at 5 by 10 to the minus nine ( nanograms )

    I then produced protocols that proved the human threshold for a brain surgeon or airline pilot was 300 nanograms……60 times higher …….yep, 60 times higher and you were fit to work 
    I’ve simplified some details here but you get my drift and if you’re interested the case is on the JCA site 
     
  17. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Cubes in Losers Get Laid results thread   
    The form has been franked 
    This comp has been going for ten plus years now…… BeeCee & Cubes have never troubled the scorekeeper,  nor the official engraver 
    Nothing has changed 
    Fredd002 & Mrzim have done well, given they’ve lost 4 lives apiece 
  18. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Cubes in Losers Get Laid results thread   
    Clearly you’re talking about Cubes… who apparently forgot to even participate last start 
  19. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from Archer in Losers Get Laid - Week 3 entry thread - Sat 16 July   
    The master is about to speak
    Flemington R1 # 2 Giga Kick, and I’m playing a JOKER please 
    Flemington R2 # 10 Oceana Blue 
    Thanks for the comp, and good luck to all the losers 
     
  20. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from Black Kirrama in Losers Get Laid - Week 3 entry thread - Sat 16 July   
    The master is about to speak
    Flemington R1 # 2 Giga Kick, and I’m playing a JOKER please 
    Flemington R2 # 10 Oceana Blue 
    Thanks for the comp, and good luck to all the losers 
     
  21. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from L.J.Shannon in Wightman is still about !!   
    If nothing else he’s humorous……in the second article he boldly declares “I’m not a nutter”
    Who's going to break the news to him ? 
  22. Like
    poundforpound got a reaction from L.J.Shannon in Wightman is still about !!   
    Just got an abusive FB message from him  
    I thought he was busy being an ignorant uneducated rabid antivaxxer in Parliament grounds……turns out the eternal loser still has time to launch another futile attack on me  
  23. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from elbow in Wightman is still about !!   
    If nothing else he’s humorous……in the second article he boldly declares “I’m not a nutter”
    Who's going to break the news to him ? 
  24. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from JJ Flash in Wightman is still about !!   
    If nothing else he’s humorous……in the second article he boldly declares “I’m not a nutter”
    Who's going to break the news to him ? 
  25. Haha
    poundforpound got a reaction from kdt in Wightman is still about !!   
    If nothing else he’s humorous……in the second article he boldly declares “I’m not a nutter”
    Who's going to break the news to him ?