7k on Hillarious Magic @$3??

[Guest]

Apparently TAB has accepted 7k on Hillarious Magic at $3 today on the last race at a Rangiora. Now into 2.20 fixed.

Isn't it great that some people are allowed to put this amount on to net 14k and yet others aren't allowed to bet very much at all on anything?

So much for equal rights and not allowed to discriminate in this country!

Quite a gutsy bet I would have thought!

Could lead you would think from gate 1, but hasn't been going that well in my opinion to risk 7k at that rate.

Has had good runs last couple of starts and been pretty average so someone obviously knows more about it than what it has been showing?

 

[Guest]

11 minutes ago, Flagship uberalles said:

Yes has been a bit weak lately although bad draws, I just put a few ew on bird of paradise got $17 my kinda price

Yes well done that was the value for a place and she opened longer than that!

I am sure the TAB love the punter that had the 3k on just as much as they hate winning punters.

TAB be fair and treat all punters equally either restrict everyone or no one!,,,,

 

 

 

[ivanthegreat 1,123]

I suspect more " Fake News " from the TAB . I made ACE HIGH the bet of the day.

How could the muppets covering the meeting pick Hillarious Magic to beat it........... these are supposed to be the industry experts.

Ask yourself this , in 12 months time who do you think will have won more races ?

Which one of these two horses would you prefer to own.?

TAB employees advising punters to back a winner......... oxymoron isn't it.

I suspect foul play.

I feel sorry for those that were duped.

[Basil 333]

42 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Apparently TAB has accepted 7k on Hillarious Magic at $3 today on the last race at a Rangiora. Now into 2.20 fixed.

Isn't it great that some people are allowed to put this amount on to net 14k and yet others aren't allowed to bet very much at all on anything?

So much for equal rights and not allowed to discriminate in this country!

 

We know Brodie, we know.  You've already told us at least 77 times!

Any update from the Human Rights Commission?

Anyway, my guess would be this.  The TAB think the $7K punter is a mug and fancy their chances of collecting from him.  They have no such illusions about you.  You should be flattered.

[Guest]

9 minutes ago, Basil said:

We know Brodie, we know.  You've already told us at least 77 times!

Any update from the Human Rights Commission?

Anyway, my guess would be this.  The TAB think the $7K punter is a mug and fancy their chances of collecting from him.  They have no such illusions about you.  You should be flattered.

Basil, not flattered at all!

All restricted punters ask is that restrictions are lifted and treated fairly and the same as every other punter.

I don't know if any other business in NZ that has restrictions on what they can purchase when others can purchase as much as they like.

Surely there are enough punters in NZ to more than cover winning punters going by what we are being told by these big bets that we hear about?

There was supposedly a multi going into the last that was going to pay out 30k as well but missed!

Fairs fair Basil, the TAB should be prepared to pay out to punters that are prepared to offload as there are more that will lose!

How would you like to be victimised in your life?....

At least 77 times Basil but not counting!

[Toblerone 242]

17 minutes ago, ivanthegreat said:

I suspect more " Fake News " from the TAB . I made ACE HIGH the bet of the day.

How could the muppets covering the meeting pick Hillarious Magic to beat it........... these are supposed to be the industry experts.

Ask yourself this , in 12 months time who do you think will have won more races ?

Which one of these two horses would you prefer to own.?

TAB employees advising punters to back a winner......... oxymoron isn't it.

I suspect foul play.

I feel sorry for those that were duped.

I don't disagree that he probably is the better of the two horses but I also don't think Ace High is as good as you seem to believe.

[Dockers 200]

2 hours ago, Brodie said:

Apparently TAB has accepted 7k on Hillarious Magic at $3 today on the last race at a Rangiora. Now into 2.20 fixed.

Isn't it great that some people are allowed to put this amount on to net 14k and yet others aren't allowed to bet very much at all on anything?

So much for equal rights and not allowed to discriminate in this country!

Quite a gutsy bet I would have thought!

Could lead you would think from gate 1, but hasn't been going that well in my opinion to risk 7k at that rate.

Has had good runs last couple of starts and been pretty average so someone obviously knows more about it than what it has been showing?

 

Honestly Brodie.

You would win the NZ cup for whinging.

Any betting organisation around the world bans or limits punters who win more times than they lose but you seem to be in to disbelief on why the NZ TAB does it. Are you honestly that stupid or are you just playing dumb.

A casino will ban anyone who constantly wins all the time. If I won poker everytime i played against my mates would they continually let me play.

Would any business in the world continually sell to another company for a loss.

Pretty simple champ. NOOOOOOO.

BRODIES world is obviously full of angels and flying unicorns.

 

[Kotare_Hunter 748]

1 minute ago, Dockers said:

Honestly Brodie.

You would win the NZ cup for whinging.

Certain to be "Brodster Out" option.

[Guest]

4 hours ago, Dockers said:

Honestly Brodie.

You would win the NZ cup for whinging.

Any betting organisation around the world bans or limits punters who win more times than they lose but you seem to be in to disbelief on why the NZ TAB does it. Are you honestly that stupid or are you just playing dumb.

A casino will ban anyone who constantly wins all the time. If I won poker everytime i played against my mates would they continually let me play.

Would any business in the world continually sell to another company for a loss.

Pretty simple champ. NOOOOOOO.

BRODIES world is obviously full of angels and flying unicorns.

 

Dockers, do you not beleive in angels and unicorns?

Seriously though, is there a NZ Cup for,whinging and is it free to nominate?

The only ones that can possibly defend the rights for betting agencies to restrict winning punters are people who are not restricted, and never will be!

Just because betting agencies around the world stop punters from wagering doesn't make it right!!!!!!!

Yes "The Brodster" goes on and on about the restrictions, because "The Brodster" knows that what they are doing is not right!

They go on about gambling responsibly and yet they are prepared to take large bets of $7000, $10,000 and $20,000 over recent weeks from other punters without any qualms!

However restricted punters basically can only get next to nothing on and are treated like we are doing something illegal by wanting to punt on odds that the TAB offer!

Brodie States  his mind whether you agree or not, people that know about the restrictions that know me, all blatantly think they should be able to do that!!

[Guest]

57 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Dockers, do you not beleive in angels and unicorns?

Seriously though, is there a NZ Cup for,whinging and is it free to nominate?

The only ones that can possibly defend the rights for betting agencies to restrict winning punters are people who are not restricted, and never will be!

Just because betting agencies around the world stop punters from wagering doesn't make it right!!!!!!!

Yes "The Brodster" goes on and on about the restrictions, because "The Brodster" knows that what they are doing is not right!

They go on about gambling responsibly and yet they are prepared to take large bets of $7000, $10,000 and $20,000 over recent weeks from other punters without any qualms!

However restricted punters basically can only get next to nothing on and are treated like we are doing something illegal by wanting to punt on odds that the TAB offer!

Brodie States  his mind whether you agree or not, people that know about the restrictions that know me, all blatantly think they should be able to do that!!

Sorry, should not be able to do that!

[Kotare_Hunter 748]

9 hours ago, Brodie said:

Sorry, should not be able to do that!

Are you sure about that ?

[Double R 260]

17 hours ago, Brodie said:

Basil, not flattered at all!

All restricted punters ask is that restrictions are lifted and treated fairly and the same as every other punter.

I don't know if any other business in NZ that has restrictions on what they can purchase when others can purchase as much as they like.

Surely there are enough punters in NZ to more than cover winning punters going by what we are being told by these big bets that we hear about?

There was supposedly a multi going into the last that was going to pay out 30k as well but missed!

Fairs fair Basil, the TAB should be prepared to pay out to punters that are prepared to offload as there are more that will lose!

How would you like to be victimised in your life?....

At least 77 times Basil but not counting!

Hi Brodie,

How about starting your own " Brodster Beat the Bookie" line? I am sure plenty of Racecafers and others would be takers.

Cheers.

Robert.

[BackPoonDrinkGoon 93]

Brodster's IQ must be hovering around 40... he is so thick he can't get around his restriction... he thinks as soon as he enters a TAB a buzzer starts going off at head office because they're scared of him. He's also quoted theirs no cameras linking to head office in pub tab's... Why don't you go to your local TAB and get a betting voucher and use an SST or go to a pub tab and place your bets... If you honestly think you can only get on for 1500 at an agency / SST / pub tab then your obviously a liar... I know plenty of people that are 'anonymous' to head office that can get on for 4+ figures without any trouble, the odd bet might take 10-15 seconds for bet approval but generally they are accepted straight away... Brodster ( eg Wayne the real estate agent ) is dead set full of it. 

[Kotare_Hunter 748]

20 minutes ago, BackPoonDrinkGoon said:

he thinks as soon as he enters a TAB a buzzer starts going off at head office because they're scared of him.

I wondered what those buzzers were about when I participated in "GingaGust" last year.

[Guest]

4 hours ago, BackPoonDrinkGoon said:

Brodster's IQ must be hovering around 40... he is so thick he can't get around his restriction... he thinks as soon as he enters a TAB a buzzer starts going off at head office because they're scared of him. He's also quoted theirs no cameras linking to head office in pub tab's... Why don't you go to your local TAB and get a betting voucher and use an SST or go to a pub tab and place your bets... If you honestly think you can only get on for 1500 at an agency / SST / pub tab then your obviously a liar... I know plenty of people that are 'anonymous' to head office that can get on for 4+ figures without any trouble, the odd bet might take 10-15 seconds for bet approval but generally they are accepted straight away... Brodster ( eg Wayne the real estate agent ) is dead set full of it. 

Firstly Mr Goon, Do not call "The Brodster a liar, as he does not tell untruths, and am not dead set full of it!

Secondly, he is not a Real Estate Agent at all!

Thirdly, these so called plenty of people that can get $1500 on are they betting to win or place or both?

So they can go in and place 1500 at $5 to return $7500 in one go without the odds being amended at any time?

If you are saying that Mr Goon then I am stating on record that you are dead set full of it!!!!

IF they are getting on for those amounts I am stating on the record that they would be known to the TAB as losing punters and they are delighted to take their bets!

You are talking crap as well if you think a 1500 bet is accepted straight away as any bet over a certain limit is always referred, so you are the one that is dead set full of it!!

 

 

[BackPoonDrinkGoon 93]

20 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Firstly Mr Goon, Do not call "The Brodster a liar, as he does not tell untruths, and am not dead set full of it!

Secondly, he is not a Real Estate Agent at all!

Thirdly, these so called plenty of people that can get $1500 on are they betting to win or place or both?

So they can go in and place 1500 at $5 to return $7500 in one go without the odds being amended at any time?

If you are saying that Mr Goon then I am stating on record that you are dead set full of it!!!!

IF they are getting on for those amounts I am stating on the record that they would be known to the TAB as losing punters and they are delighted to take their bets!

You are talking crap as well if you think a 1500 bet is accepted straight away as any bet over a certain limit is always referred, so you are the one that is dead set full of it!!

 

 

Win or place, and yes that is exactly what I'm saying. I could easily send you thru some photos of exactly that happening but I have no incentive to do that as you are like a talking bird repeating itself continually... 

Please explain to me how on earth does the TAB know who someone is who is placing a bet at a pub tab SST or who walks in to an agency and puts his bet on over the counter or thru an SST ? 

Lastly, if your names actually Brodie ( which I've been informed it isn't ) why don't you private message me your TAB acc number and I'll send you a little donation for doubting The Brodster ( who for some unknown reason likes to refer to himself as a third party )

[Guest]

23 minutes ago, BackPoonDrinkGoon said:

Win or place, and yes that is exactly what I'm saying. I could easily send you thru some photos of exactly that happening but I have no incentive to do that as you are like a talking bird repeating itself continually... 

Please explain to me how on earth does the TAB know who someone is who is placing a bet at a pub tab SST or who walks in to an agency and puts his bet on over the counter or thru an SST ? 

Lastly, if your names actually Brodie ( which I've been informed it isn't ) why don't you private message me your TAB acc number and I'll send you a little donation for doubting The Brodster ( who for some unknown reason likes to refer to himself as a third party )

Mr Goon.

Yes I would be very interested for you to post a photo or two of these bets that you are saying are being placed by these plenty of people!

I take it that you aren't able to if you don't post them!

To say that there is no incentive to do that is a cop out and you have no evidence that these bets are in fact being accepted by thE TAB!

The TAB doesn't know it is me at all, they just see the bets coming thru and suspend the horse and then slashs the odds on that horse, got nothing to do with who it is, but the liability!!!! 

The TAB Bookies are so risk averse!

"The Brodster" doesn't need any donations from anyone but I do take offence to someone that is talking crap accusing "The Brodster" of telling porkies, when that is not the case.

You have to be kidding if you think that I would send you my a/c no.

Finally I  and all the others on here would love to see the evidence of these large 4 figure bets that are being placed!!!!

Look forward to seeing them and then that might give myself and other punters some hope that getting our bets on are possible!!!!

[BackPoonDrinkGoon 93]

1 hour ago, Brodie said:

Mr Goon.

Yes I would be very interested for you to post a photo or two of these bets that you are saying are being placed by these plenty of people!

I take it that you aren't able to if you don't post them!

To say that there is no incentive to do that is a cop out and you have no evidence that these bets are in fact being accepted by thE TAB!

The TAB doesn't know it is me at all, they just see the bets coming thru and suspend the horse and then slashs the odds on that horse, got nothing to do with who it is, but the liability!!!! 

The TAB Bookies are so risk averse!

"The Brodster" doesn't need any donations from anyone but I do take offence to someone that is talking crap accusing "The Brodster" of telling porkies, when that is not the case.

You have to be kidding if you think that I would send you my a/c no.

Finally I  and all the others on here would love to see the evidence of these large 4 figure bets that are being placed!!!!

Look forward to seeing them and then that might give myself and other punters some hope that getting our bets on are possible!!!!

Cool story bro, check your PM's I sent ya a couple of 5k+ liabilitys, it's not hard you just need to use your brain, look where repeating yourself 835 times on here has got you.

 

edit: So brodsters reply was rather predictable and apparently the tab are happy taking big bets on gallops and those punters aren't restricted as much as harness. Lol. 

[Fartoomuch 1,376]

33 minutes ago, BackPoonDrinkGoon said:

Cool story bro, check your PM's I sent ya a couple of 5k+ liabilitys, it's not hard you just need to use your brain, look where repeating yourself 835 times on here has got you.

 

edit: So brodsters reply was rather predictable and apparently the tab are happy taking big bets on gallops and those punters aren't restricted as much as harness. Lol. 

You didn't expect anything less from the fool did you. I'm sure you wont fall into the trap of engaging sensibly with the fool again BPDG as he is incapable of seeing reason and or/logic from what he has previously posted.

[Guest]

1 hour ago, BackPoonDrinkGoon said:

Cool story bro, check your PM's I sent ya a couple of 5k+ liabilitys, it's not hard you just need to use your brain, look where repeating yourself 835 times on here has got you.

 

edit: So brodsters reply was rather predictable and apparently the tab are happy taking big bets on gallops and those punters aren't restricted as much as harness. Lol. 

Yes you did send thru a couple of 5k liabilities I acknowledge that.

However, harness racing fans, and this being a harness racing site and not a galloping blog.

Mr Goon sent thru examples of bets at Avondale races, and as far as I am aware there are NOT HARNESS RACING run at Avondale!!!!!

It is HARNESS Punters that are RESTRICTED and NOT GALLOPING punters, as the TAB does not seem to restrict galloping punters the same as harness!

I have requested that Mr Goon send thru these examples of these Harness  big bets he says he knows are going on, and I am still waiting!

So, he comes on here again and tries to make out that Brodie is a liar!!!!!

Waste of time posting topics on here when you have clowns and his mates trying to make out that what the  Brodster says is not true.

Wife says get off this site as you are dealing with a lot of xxxxxxxxxxxx, so some of you will be pleased that I am going to give up posting again, and spend more time investing and travelling and will have more time to do so.

Race Cafe will not be the same without "The Brodster" and I hope someone else takes up the issues!

To the ones that have had Brodie on I have enjoyed it and to the ones that appreciated Brodie's telling it the way it is, Thankyou.

Over and out for good!!!!!!!!!

 

[Kotare_Hunter 748]

7:42pm Monday 29 May 2017.

[BackPoonDrinkGoon 93]

Just now, Kotare_Hunter said:

7:42pm Monday 29 May 2017.

R.I.P

racecafe will never be the same again.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

said no one ever.

[Happy Sunrise 554]

18 minutes ago, BackPoonDrinkGoon said:

said no one ever.

I will.

[Toblerone 242]

Sorry to see you go, Brodie. I valued what you said and I know you are actually correct in what you say.

You cop a lot of heat, most of it unfounded.

Go well.

[Sickopunter 403]

On 28/05/2017 at 4:38 PM, Brodie said:

 

 

 

On 28/05/2017 at 4:58 PM, ivanthegreat said:

I suspect more " Fake News " from the TAB . I made ACE HIGH the bet of the day.

How could the muppets covering the meeting pick Hillarious Magic to beat it........... these are supposed to be the industry experts.

Ask yourself this , in 12 months time who do you think will have won more races ?

Which one of these two horses would you prefer to own.?

TAB employees advising punters to back a winner......... oxymoron isn't it.

I suspect foul play.

I feel sorry for those that were duped.

What does 12 months or who you would rather own have to do with that race? You're correct on both counts but both 100% irrelevant. Also one was drawn ideally and one poorly.